Labour has blood on its hands, suggests Chris Trotter is his column today about the Pike River disaster. He says that the traditions of the Labour Party are to make life safer for workers, yet 'if there's "blood on the coal" at Pike River - Labour helped to put it there during its time in office in the 1980s and then under the Helen Clark Government - see: Labour shares Pike River guilt. Trotter tries to explain why the last Labour Government - and especially those ministers in the Labour portfolio; 'Margaret Wilson (1999-2004); Ruth Dyson (2005-07); and Trevor Mallard (2007-08)' - 'for nine long years did nothing to prevent the tragedy which, in such a criminally deregulated environment, was only ever a matter of time'. Apparently, there 'was no appetite in the Clark-led Labour Government for a return to the so-called "heavy-handed" regulations of the past' and he says that the current Labour Party is still enthralled with neoliberalism and deregulation.
What about the union movement? According to leftwing blogger Steven Cowan, the union movement - or at least the Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing Union (EPMU) - also has blood on its hands. In a stridently critical blogpost entitled How 'modern unionism' failed the Pike River miners, Cowan quotes Labour MPs Damien O'Connor and Andrew Little defending the Pike River Company. O'Connor is quoted from 2010 saying that the disaster was 'just one of these things that the West Coast unfortunately has had to get used to over the years' and suggesting that the company wasn't necessarily to blame. According to Cowan, the then the head of the EPMU, Andrew Little, went into bat for the company saying there was 'nothing unusual about Pike River or this mine that we've been particularly concerned about'.
But for the moment the heat continues to be on the National Government and Kate Wilkinson, who continues to refuse to resign from Cabinet. The political rule to never ask a question publically that you don't already know the answer to may well apply to Wilkinson's 'What have I done wrong?' Her apparently genuine bewilderment at being asked to make a real sacrifice shows, more than any other statement, that her resignation as Minister of Labour was purely a symbolic and political gesture. After all - why resign at all if no wrong has been done? It seems the public servants under Wilkinson may be clearly told what they did wrong as John Key 'refused to rule out further heads rolling within the public service as a result of the tragedy' - see Andrea Vance, Tracy Watkins and Danya Levy's 'What have I done wrong?'.
While there may be no smoking gun linking Wilkinson directly to the Pike River tragedy, her overall performance in protecting New Zealand workers from harm may provide some answers to her question. After the mine disaster Shell Todd Service general manager Rob Jager was asked to lead a task force to improve workplace safety and he described New Zealand's record in workplace health and safety as 'extremely poor'. This week he said that 'Our fatality rate is more than six times as bad as UK and nearly twice as bad as Australia' - see Audrey Young's NZ's safety record slammed.
There have been numerous editorials and opinion pieces urging the government to get on with implementing the Royal Commission's recommendations. Nearly all, like Brian Rudman, say leaving businesses to look after workplace safety was a mistake that must be rectified - see: Bring back Nanny State - she'll help keep us safe. There are parallels with other costly mistakes thinks Rosemary McLeod: 'In the fever of deregulation that we imagined meant good things would happen, we also changed building regulations, resulting in a housing catastrophe that we seem unwilling to confront and which will roll on for years to come, ruining people who bought homes in good faith' - see: Pike River a show of profits before safety.