IT IS nothing new for an opposition political party, in an election year, to come up with proposals for the incumbent government to sneer at. What both sides hope people don't remember is that proposals can be refreshes - or rehashes - of a policy the other side had come up with when they were government in the past. Or a party could be sneering at a proposal they once gave birth to.
God help me, but I confess I tended to lose track of who trended what proposal after the days of Rogernomics, when the Labour Party abruptly took into their heads to let market forces rule New Zealand.
Back then (and I was pretty young) it was often comedians David McPhail and Jon Gabsby who provided the insights into this economic experiment - which in the end did bring us into the global economy.
But, with some research,I can reflect there is often a difference between the feel-good promises in election year, and some of the hard (and groundbreaking) decisions that get made when a party gets into power.
For example, Labour introduced the fourth week of annual leave, but National allowed employees to cash it in.