• Peter Lyons teaches economics at Saint Peter's College in Epsom. He is unlikely to ever be employed by NZQA.
My nephew has just finished his secondary schooling experience. He is a classic product of NCEA. It has been a puzzling experience for his elderly parents who forked out a considerable amount for his private school education. My nephew and I have had to reassure them on numerous occasions that his laid-back approach to achievement under NCEA is generally the norm. His reassurances have usually been less convincing than mine.
My nephew is a smart kid, likely the result of a genetic throwback or damage at birth. He has taken a range of subjects, including physics and maths, to level 3. For those of us in the teaching game these subjects tend to be the preserve of the more academically able students. Not that there is a hierarchy of subjects under NCEA. That would suggest an element of academic bigotry. A dubious belief that some knowledge is more difficult to master than others. Under NCEA, knowledge is knowledge is knowledge. Learning to make a decent coffee can generate credits the same as mastering the dark art of quantum physics or differential equations.
My laid-back nephew's parents have struggled to understand how he could achieve success while lying on the couch watching Sky Sport and facilitating his ample social life.
Apparently they just don't get it because they were such social dweebs when they were young. He had to constantly reassure them that school was not like in their day, a century ago. There are no real sharp edges these days. The high stakes pass-fail regime of school certificate is a medieval anachronism.