They nearly got away with it. If they hadn't left in that rule about not letting someone who gets pregnant while on a benefit keep it when their newest brat turns 1, it's quite likely no one would have noticed anything wrong with the benefit cull, or, as it's officially called, "resetting expectations".
After all, people who aren't sick shouldn't be paid by us to stay out of work. People shouldn't breed with strangers and be paid by us in order to stay out of work.
That said, sickness beneficiaries are already subject to regular reviews of their fitness for work. Real, live doctors with qualifications have to sign off on that benefit, so if there are abuses of the system, surely it's the doctors who should be targeted.
As for the work-shy, one-woman baby factories, allegedly pumping out sprogs for a living, that theory can only be held by anyone who has never faced the horror that is having a baby. It's the toughest job in the world. Anyone who sees caring for an infant, with all the attendant drudgery, as the soft option would be of such limited intelligence it's hard to know what job they could manage. Experimental drug subject? Mattress tester? Hunter's decoy?
You can't accuse Social Development Minister Paula Bennett of aiming too high. If the changes work, according to her boss, John Key, 46,000 people will come off benefits and another 11,000 will go into part-time work. That adds up to 3000 fewer people than have gone on benefits since National took office. This is not a revolution. It's not even keeping up.