Former Porirua school teacher Stacey Reriti in the dock during her sentencing, for sexual violation of a 10-year-old boy. Photo / NZH
A female teacher jailed for almost a decade for sexually violating and manipulating a 10-year-old boy has been refused parole for the sixth time.
Porirua woman Stacey Reriti was jailed for nine years and nine months for sexual offending against a boy who was a student at the school where she worked as deputy principal.
The offending took place between 2012 and 2014 and was described as "frequent" - taking place largely in a car and once in a motel.
The victim was just 10 when the abuse began - at a secluded area the teacher drove him to.
The offending escalated from kissing, culminating in sexual intercourse.
Her behaviour was "positive" and she was "working hard" and a "strong leader in the Māori Focus Unit".
"Ms Reriti has completed 20 individual treatment sessions with a psychologist, the Alcohol and Other Drug Brief programme, and some education including Maori Woman's Leadership," said Parole Board panel convenor Mary More.
Last time the board saw Reriti it asked her to complete guided releases and engage with a community group outside the wire.
Reriti told the board at her recent hearing that she had done that "as much as Covid-19 has allowed".
She asked for more time to do the work needed and the board heard accommodation connected to the community group would be available for her in September.
"She wants time to build that relationship. She also wants to continue with her trauma counselling," More said in the parole decision released to the Herald.
"The board sees merit in Ms Reriti's proposal. She does not feel that she is ready for release and as such her risk is undue and parole is declined."
Reriti will appear before the Parole Board again in September and consideration will be given that day to whether she is released or not.
The convicted sex offender used to teach at Natone Park School in Porirua.
At her sentencing in 2015 Crown prosecutor Dale LaHood said the victim was "especially vulnerable" at the time of the offending because one of his parents "was extremely unwell".