Stop could seek the consent condition again in future, whenever new subdivisions were proposed near the peninsula's sensitive wildlife areas, she said.
In time, she hoped the peninsula would become free of all "predators", including cats.
"We certainly don't want owners with cats adjoining the reserve. All the other neighbours are very aware of that and none of them keep cats."
The no-cats concept was becoming more common elsewhere in New Zealand, often promoted by developers themselves, she said.
Stop had tried once before to have the no-cats rule included as a consent condition for a peninsula subdivision, without success, but Mrs Frazer hoped the idea would eventually catch on.
The property's owner declined to comment yesterday, while Otago Peninsula Biodiversity Group chairman Brendon Cross was also reluctant to be drawn into the debate.
Council resource consents manager Alan Worthington said the council's hearings committee "might be able" to consider such a condition, but doing so could also be problematic.
"It comes with some difficulties, I suspect, in terms of being able to enforce it."
It could also throw more fuel on the fire of last year's debate, which erupted when economist, businessman and philantropist Gareth Morgan launched a campaign to control cats.
The proposed subdivision would be considered on October 21, and a council planner has recommended consent be declined.
That was because the new site would be "significantly undersized" for residential development, and create an "undesirable" precedent.
