Neville Thomson, 69, was killed in a dog attack on Thursday. Photo / Supplied
Police say a Hokianga man fatally mauled in last week's horrific dog attack was not killed by his own animals.
That backs up the family's account that the dogs responsible for the death of 69-year-old Neville Thomson belonged to a friend staying at his Puketawa Rd home.
Three dogs, which were behaving aggressively when emergency services arrived, escaped but were shot by police when they returned to the property.
Two were killed while a third fled into a bush area. It was, however, thought to have been fatally wounded.
Meanwhile, the Far North District Council reported that another dog returned to the property on Monday morning.
It was not known whether the female mastiff, which had not been seen at the property since Thursday, was involved in the fatal mauling.
Animal management officers were heading back to the remote property on Monday afternoon in a bid to capture the dog. If that proved impossible they planned to set a trap.
In total 28 dogs were located at the remote property about 3km north of Panguru.
Of those, 25 are being held at the Far North District Council's Kaitāia pound.
Detective Senior Sergeant Mark Dalzell, investigations manager for Far North police, said a post-mortem conducted on Saturday had confirmed a dog attack was the cause of death.
There was no evidence the deceased's own dogs were involved.
"It's likely that the dogs responsible were the dogs of another person that was staying at the address."
The owner of the dogs was living at the address but was not present when the attack occurred. He raised the alarm when he returned to the property.
"He has been very, very upset with what he found, and he's been doing everything he can to help us understand what has taken place," Dalzell said.
Police were still working out what charge could be laid, as well as reporting their findings to the Coroner who would make a determination and issue any recommendations.
He had no doubt there were lessons to be learned around keeping dangerous dogs, but it was up to the Coroner and ultimately politicians to decide what needed to be done.
Dean Myburgh, the Far North District Council's general manager of district services, said police were the lead agency but animal management officers were assisting where they could.
Dog traps provided to the police had since been returned.
It was "most unusual" to have 28 dogs on one property, Myburgh said.
"From a council point of view having that number of unregistered dogs on one property is in itself a problem.
"Where people have registered dogs in the past and haven't re-registered them, our animal management team endeavours to follow up, first with phone calls and then by physically going to the address.
"In this instance, no dogs were recorded as being at the property since 2014."
No complaints had been made about dogs at the "very remote" property.
"Unless information like that came to our attention, animal management officers wouldn't have a reason to go out there."
"What can happen in a dog fight scenario is that they're trying to protect themselves from the other dog and they can become quite indiscriminate in their biting.
"The worst-case scenario is it may have been a pack situation where the dogs packed on the guy."
Vette said a lack of socialisation as puppies was most often what led to aggressive behaviour in adult dogs.
"It sounds like it's quite an isolated place where it was so it's likely they didn't get much socialisation with other people."
He said it was still possible to rehabilitate an older dog who has not been socialised enough in the crucial two to four-month-old puppy stage.
"It's also worth noting that it's a very rare incident and although it's frightening and it's worrying, we can do things about it," he added.