When the 150th anniversary of the battle of Rangiriri, one of the most important clashes in New Zealand history, was marked in November 2013 just one MP (Te Ururoa Flavell) showed up for the commemorations.
Overall spending on the Waikato War sesquicentenary (2013-14) has been estimated at no more than one per cent of Government expenditure on World War I centennial activities.
I mention these facts in The Great War for New Zealand not to argue against marking World War I, but to make a case for paying greater attention to the wars fought on our own shores. The assertion that these conflicts have always been central to New Zealand history (Professor Michael Belgrave in the Herald on Tuesday) is at odds with this official neglect and naïve in its assumption that evolving historical and public understanding are one and the same.
For much of the twentieth century Pakeha New Zealanders remembered a heavily mythologised version of the New Zealand Wars, full of stories of mutual heroism and chivalry (such as the tale of "Rewi's last stand"). But when darker, more truthful accounts began to emerge from the 1970s onwards the backlash was swift. Just ask James Belich. Or for that matter Tainui and other iwi.
They have never forgotten. And they have carried this history for too long on their own. It is time for other New Zealanders to embrace these difficult aspects of our nation's past. That does not require atonement nor vilification. As Jim Bolger said at a recent event to mark the publication of The Great War for New Zealand: "We should teach our history to every young New Zealander going through school, so they feel comfortable with it. And if they're comfortable with it, they'll be more comfortable as a society."