National vs Eminem: High Court decision to drop on Wednesday

A judgement is set to be released tomorrow on whether the National Party infringed copyright by using music that sounded suspiciously like rapper Eminem's song "Lose Yourself" in its election advertising.

The track, named "Eminem-esque", was used as a backing track over footage of rowing as part of National's advertising campaign before the 2014 general election.

The High Court case - which could have international ramifications - hinges on whether the track was too similar to Eminem's hit track, which topped the charts after it featured in the 2002 movie 8 Mile.

Questioned about the stoush in 2014, National's campaign manager Steven Joyce said the National Party thought using the music was "pretty legal".

Publishers for the American rapper's copyrights, Eight Mile Style and Martin Affiliated, initiated proceedings in September 2014.

National bought the music for $4800 from Beatbox, a licensed music company from Australia. In court it argued it had done so in good faith and had sought assurances that there was no risk of copyright infringement.

But Eight Mile's lawyer Gary Williams said the National Party infringed copyright by using the song, or a substantial reproduction of it.

Williams said even if National only authorised the infringement, that in itself would be a breach of copyright.

The song was "without doubt the jewel in the crown of Eminem's musical work", winning an Academy Award and two Grammy awards, he said in his opening remarks in a court hearing earlier this year.

"The licensing of the song has been extremely carefully controlled. Despite many requests, it has only rarely been licensed for advertising purposes.

"When licensed, it can command in the millions of dollars. That's how valuable it is."

The two-week court case played out in May to world-wide publicity, with US comedian John Oliver poking fun at New Zealand and the National Party, which has been the butt of his jokes for some time.

On May 12 Justice Helen Cull reserved her decision, noting that such decisions usually took up to three months to deliver.

There has been no comment from the courts on why the decision has taken more than five months to be released, leading to speculation the delay was politically motivated to avoid the election period.

The judgement is due to be released at 3pm on Wednesday.

Watch: National party ad

Watch: Eminem's 'Lose Yourself'