The theory that by building in bulk might trim the price is barely true. And that if you free-up vast tracks of land you'll get the land cheaper, therefore the final price falls, doesn't appear to be the case either.
So for those who fell under the Phil Twyford spell that somehow thousands upon thousands of first home buyers locked out of the market would suddenly magically be able to afford a home - it simply isn't true.
KiwiBuild is basically a reflection of the market already in operation. Do remember, not a single KiwiBuild home has been sold yet.
Eighteen are due in the next month or so, but as these figures show at prices not a lot different to what other homes are already selling for.
The real issue here - and this has become clearer and clearer with time and experience - is not the price of the KiwiBuild home, but the affordability.
At $650,000, you can call these homes anything you want. But affordable, for most, they are not.
And that is the political con in all of this.
As Treasury already told us months back, there are very, very few people comparatively who have the income to support the mortgage required to pay what is essentially a $600,000 mortgage.
Even with a 10 per cent deposit, which KiwiBuild will allow, you still need close to $600,000. And to fund that even at 5 per cent interest you need incomes well into the six figures to make it work.
For more property news and listings go to
oneroof.co.nz
So join the dots, the market price and KiwiBuild price aren't that different. A small percentage of people have the income to pay a mortgage of that size, so for those that do, they're already in the market and buying.
So what, if any, difference are Twyford's houses making? Are people locked out able to buy a Twyford house? No, they were locked out before, and they're locked out now.
Yes he's adding to supply, which is good, but that would have happened anyway.
The cold hard facts, the median price versus the KiwiBuild price are exposing the rort.
They're not affordable, they are just another house.