Here is how I see Helen Clark's bid to be the United Nations Secretary-General.
I'm no fan of the United Nations - it's dysfunctional, it's unwieldy, it's ineffective and its rules are in desperate need of reform. But the tragedy is that the rules can't be changed because of the very rules that need changing.
Any decisions have to be unanimous and any decisions can be vetoed by the five permanent members of the security council. But the five permanent members don't represent the modern world and hate each other. Well, not all of them of course, but take the United States, Russia and China and put them in a room on anything and you will be going nowhere fast.
Ask any of them whether they want to give away some of their power by way of reform and you know what the answer is before you even ask.
In a nutshell, it's a spineless mess that has allowed the world is disintegrate before its very eyes. In the theatre of military turmoil - of which there is much - they do nothing but disagree on what to do on everything. This leaves the United States to play global sheriff, and when the United States is led by a bloke like Obama, his first thought process is to bring troops home, hence you have vacuums, violence and carnage everywhere from Afghanistan to Syria to Iraq to Libya.