But despite all of this, the United Nations isn't going anywhere and it does need someone to run it - so why not Helen Clark? This is why we should all be behind this. Anytime a country our size gets to be at the top table of anything we should take it.
Helen Clark isn't going to transform the UN any more than Ban Ki-moon hasn't or Boutros Boutros-Ghlai or Kofi Annan but that's not the point. It's the influence of the job, it's the doors it opens, it's the access it gives.
Remember that every time a Prime Minister from this country heads off to an international pow wow, it's not the event itself that counts, it's the pull-asides, the dinners, the moments in the corridors. That is where the action is and where the deals are done.
Anything this country can do to get itself front and centre with the genuine global heavy weights, we should be leaping at.
We should also be mature enough to put politics aside at a domestic level in order to see the big picture. When Don McKinnon was running the Commonwealth, no one cared what party he came from same with Mike Moore at the World Trade Organisation. Good political operators do business above and beyond their original political beliefs and constraints in the country from which they came.
A win for Helen Clark is a win for all of us.
READ MORE:
• World's media talks up Clark's bid
• Kevin Rudd sends best wishes to Helen Clark
• Editorial: Kudos to Clark despite odds against her
Debate on this article is now closed.