"To be frank I think people are over it, we've had a year of it and people want a final decision made."
Ms Hardaker reiterated her stance that fluoridation should be a central government issue.
"That is the fact of the matter, that is the reality of it all and until central government takes a stand on this issue local authorities are going to continue and continue to have to go through these processes," she said.
The council's lawyer said before yesterday's vote that there was no legal obligation to delay their vote.
On Tuesday at the High Court in New Plymouth Justice Hansen reserved his decision. His ruling could be subject to further appeals - meaning an even longer delay of possibly up to a year for Hamiltonians.
"The most prudent action for this council is to defer its action until that decision has been made," said Councillor Margaret Forsyth.
Councillors were also asked to consider whether the city should recommence fluoridating the water supply while providing a non-fluoridated water source.
Waikato District Health Board medical officer of health Felicity Dumble said the decision was frustrating and disappointing.
"One of our frustrations is the longer they delay the more time we don't have fluoridation in our drinking water and therefore oral health will deteriorate and also inequalities will increase."
At council hearings on fluoridation earlier this year, only 11 per cent of the 1557 submissions wanted to retain fluoride, while 89 per cent wanted it scrapped.
However, nearly 70 per cent of Hamilton voters favoured water fluoridation in a non-binding referendum held alongside local body elections last month.
