Last week MediaWorks announced that current affairs show Campbell Live might be canned, as part of a review of TV3 news programming. Within hours, several #SaveCampbellLive Facebook pages had sprung up, the hashtag was trending on Twitter and at least three different petitions had started. One of those was by ActionStation, a campaigning group I helped found last year. At time of writing, more than 70,000 New Zealanders have signed our petition to save Campbell Live, making it the fastest growing petition on our site since we began in July 2014.
Although we couldn't have predicted the scale of response to this petition, the strength of feeling among our members came as no surprise. Campbell Live, and John Campbell himself, stand for the same values that underpin ActionStation: A commitment to a fairer and more equitable future for all, a belief in the goodness and power of ordinary people working together, and an insistence that people who make decisions affecting the lives of ordinary Kiwis be held accountable for those decisions.
John Campbell has thanked signers of our petition for their support, but some media commentators have criticised our efforts, arguing that petitions won't help, only ratings will. As someone who dedicated the past year to launching an online campaigning movement, and one of the organisers of this petition, I might be expected to come to the defence of the petition. But I think the critics have a point.
Five years ago, Malcolm Gladwell warned that internet-enabled activism would make it "easier for activists to express themselves, and harder for that expression to have any impact". As ActionStation adviser and former new media director for President Obama's Organising for America, Ben Brandzel noted in response at the time, this warning is wrong only in its absolutism - the phenomenon he's describing is a real, growing and serious problem.