The defendant and the girl met on a video chat website in June 2023 before moving to Snapchat, where the Crown alleges the complainant told him she was 13.
The pair dated for months and had sex on multiple occasions, both parties accepted.
The complainant became pregnant and an abortion clinic recorded a person called “Luke” made the girl an appointment and gave Fairgray’s number.
Fairgray gave the centre her correct date of birth and lied about his own age, saying he was 15.
Gray said he did so because by that point he knew she was only 13.
After the abortion, it’s alleged by the Crown that further sexual activity occurred on at least one occasion.
The next month the girl went missing temporarily and police became aware of the relationship between the pair.
Usually, the burden to prove charges lies with the prosecution, however, in this case the defence does not contest that she was 13 when the sexual conduct occurred.
Judge Evangelos Thomas said the jury needed to consider whether, on the balance of probabilities, the accused had a reasonable belief that the girl was 16 and that he took reasonable steps to find out whether she was 16.
“He has to prove both of those things.”
Earlier today, forensic psychiatrist Dr James Cavney told the jury Fairgray was high-functioning and “doesn’t have an intellectual disability”.
Under cross-examination, prosecutor Pip McNabb asked whether a person with autism would accept an outright lie.
Speaking about Fairgray specifically, Cavney said he was rigid in his thinking and had difficulty picking up emotional cues.
“I think he would have been inclined to accept her word at face value.”
Gray opened her case yesterday and told the jury because it was a criminal offence to have sex with a minor, which Fairgray agreed had occurred, there was only one way to find him not guilty.
That is, she said, the jury must be satisfied he reasonably believed she was 16 and took reasonable steps to verify her age.
“When considering these issues you need to bear in mind Luca Fairgray’s diagnosis of autism,” she told the court during her opening argument today.
Although she said autism in itself was not a defence to the charges, and Fairgray was not mounting a disability defence, “The reality is, his brain is different to yours and mine.”
She told the court this was a biological fact he could not control and it impacted his assessment of real-life situations.
Gray argued that not applying his autism diagnosis when considering the evidence would effectively be discriminating based on his disability.
Both Fairgray and the complainant have autism and ADHD.
Also yesterday, the court heard evidence from two police officers who attended Fairgray’s home after the girl went missing.
When constables Scott Loper and Danielle You arrived at the house they spoke to the man’s father, who then went to look for his son.
Supplying a Class C drug carries a maximum penalty of eight years in prison.
Katie Harris is an Auckland-based journalist who covers issues including sexual assault, workplace misconduct, media, crime and justice. She joined the Herald in 2020.
Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.