Loss of faith
Any faith I may have had in the NZ Labour Party has been quashed by the Prime Minister’s announcement that Labour will not introduce a capital gains tax or wealth tax if it is re-elected. No doubt it considers that any such tax would be electoral suicide. However, this country urgently needs many billions of dollars spent on infrastructure and capital investment in education, health and housing. Does Labour really believe that these needs can be delivered from the current combination of PAYE income tax and GST? If so, it deserves to be relegated to the opposition benches of our Parliament.
Peter Graham, Helensville.
Refreshing response
How refreshing to read the Prime Minister’s response to the most recent polls - “the polls were a message to Labour that voters thought it had lost its focus”. In my view Labour hasn’t, but I struggle to recall any leader’s response that genuinely acknowledged the reality and took the results on board, and, agreed to respond to what the voters are saying. Good on you Chippie - a rarity, a truly honest and genuine politician.
Peter Huggard, Waiheke
Seeking a destination
I want to live in a country that takes care of all its citizens, treats all with fairness and equality, takes care of its aged and disabled, provides a good education for all, with good healthcare, gives all views respect, does not attack other countries, does not seek military domination, and has an enlightened workable attitude for the future of our planet. I am not sure which country that is.
Keith Duggan, Browns Bay
Little impact
Emma Mackintosh is worried we might lose our fight to survive. I expect everyone is worried. But our survival doesn’t depend on the measures we take in our own tiny country. Our survival depends on the actions of the major ‘climate change’ countries - China, US, India, UK. We can show a good attitude, but any reduction in our emissions will have a negligible effect on climate change.
Chris Elias, Mission Bay
Science curriculum
The outrage by teachers and academics against the draft proposal of the new science curriculum as outlined in the editorial (Herald on Sunday, July 9) needs to be addressed. Apparently the new guiding document contains no mention of physics, chemistry and biology but is being described as “at the cutting edge”. It really will need to be as it is yet another concern to add to the problems recently highlighted in this country with regard to education such as high truancy rates, low numeracy and literacy rates and teacher strikes for better pay and conditions. Perhaps the sector needs to recruit, train and retain great teachers. This is done by recognising those who are passionate about their profession, who are highly qualified and who are rewarded and respected for their efforts in a challenging environment. However, as a teacher for many years, I see highly qualified men and women already doing amazing things with our students but not given the reward and respect they deserve. That leads to poor morale and low retention rates in any profession. This will only exacerbate the problems in the education sector.
Bernard Walker, Papamoa
Green policies
As Heather du Plessis-Allan writes (Herald on Sunday, July 9), Green voters are unhappy with their party’s current policies and direction. You would think that being Green and in favour of the environment would be the easiest political sell in New Zealand. Real Green policies would include dealing with forestry slash, stopping bottom trawling in the Hauraki Gulf, stop building on flood plains, leading the cry for better water, waste water and transport systems. But no. The NZ Greens cannot help themselves but waste time and effort on social engineering which they know nothing about. This is why the Green vote will collapse this election. No NZ party explains climate change and how to achieve mitigation in an acceptable timeframe.
Gary Carter, Gulf Harbour
Limited improvements
After reading Trade Minister Damien O’Connor’s puff piece on the NZ-EU Free Trade Agreement (Herald on Sunday July 9), you have to ask: So, what’s in it for the other guy? To find out, we need to go to the European Union website, and see how they are selling the deal to their constituency. And there it all is - level playing field stuff: equal treatment for EU investors in NZ; equal access to NZ government procurement contracts; non-discriminatory competition law treatment, and so on. Well, given the failings of free trade and level playing fields revealed by the GFC and Covid, I believe we should query this. A sovereign country should be able to put the interests of its own farmers, firms and workers first – as, of course, the EU implacably does with its farmers. Our vaunted trade negotiators should be given a more demanding brief than selling short our sovereignty in exchange for what are very limited improvements in access for our exporters.
Tim Hazledine, Emeritus Professor of Economics at the University of Auckland