Green camouflage
Auckland Council’s new tax grab masquerades in green camouflage. Taking compostable material from your property that costs a fortune to buy and charging you $71.28 a year for the privilege is criminal — theft. If you don’t use their service they effectively steal 2.25 per cent more in rates. If you use it they steal your compost used to reduce the demand for shop grown vegetables. There being no option to opt out, if some enterprising councillor wishes to change this they would get my vote. Steve Russell, Hillcrest
Elephant in the room
Heather du Plessis-Allan applauded Kieran McAnulty for his honesty over Affordable Water Reforms. But is he being completely honest? The elephant in the room is “Te Mana O Te Wai” which is the 100 per cent Māori overseeing body of the 10 water entities. Their statements have to be taken into consideration by the entities. McAnulty thinks there was co-governance in the Treaty. This is wrong. He needs to do more homework. Pauline Alexander, Waiatarua
Not fit for purpose
When 20 per cent of current NZ politicians have fumbled and stumbled over their duties and responsibilities forcing apologies (including those that should have been made, Trevor Mallard) do we not now recognise that too many of our elected politicians are not fit for purpose. It seems the fault lies with the low entry level. We urgently need a quality examination for all current and would be NZ politicians which must be passed (failure means one cannot stand) with marks made public so voters have a better chance of selecting personnel capable of being in government or opposition and making a meaningful contribution to the country. Could some political scientists and personnel consultants please collaborate to create the exam? Gary Carter, Gulf Harbour
Daylight robbery
How interesting is it that Heather du Plessis-Allan is challenging — this time the Government’s spokesperson Kieran McAnulty — on why or how the Three Waters concept stands up on merit and in light of democracy alone. Maybe Heather is arguing again what many of us see as daylight robbery, handing over assets built up over many decades, by New Zealanders, not just white Kiwis or Kiwis of colour. No, by everyone who has ever paid rates, directly or indirectly. Could it therefore not be argued that this minister is in favour of stealing hard-earned infrastructural assets and handing control over to a minority? This entire exercise could — very loosely — be compared to the selling off of Kiwirail, which in effect was built up by the taxpayer, then sold off to bankers and overseas magnates, who in return ran it down, minimised re-investment, only to sell it back a decade or two later in a run-down state for an overinflated value to the government — and for the taxpayer to pick up the tab once again. Thank goodness, that there are still journalists like Heather du Plessis-Allan around, who really care about our country, especially in these fragile times. Rene Blezer, Taupō
Transparent water
Heather du Plessis-Allan labels Three Waters as tinkering with democracy. It was brought about by necessity to bring drinking water up to world health standards and stormwater drainage up to a level to handle current and future needs and not pollute our rivers, streams, lakes and oceans. Unfortunately many councils over many decades have ignored what is below the ground and out of sight and therefore bears the brunt of cost-cutting to appease ratepayers with keeping rates down. The Havelock North saga with drinking water, the boil water notices to numerous regions and the inadequacies in our stormwater system with weather bombs have all shown that present system failing and councils can’t fund or game enough to raise rates for years of underfunding. Sure the presentation wasn’t the best idea, but the Minister in charge was thrown under the bus to present and handle Three Waters while the Government handled other issues of the day. What I do class as undemocratic is the formation of the Super City. Key wanted power, needed Hide and the Act party too do so, and Rodney Hide said only if Auckland legislated to be a Super City. Ratepayers had all their assets stripped with no consultation, only the stroke of pen for power. Sarron Bennett, Manurewa
That’s rich
An unnamed “rich lister” quoted in a front-page article complains that the IRD and Treasury research on tax inequities makes wealthy manufacturers “look like criminals”. While I agree that those who have earned their wealth through privilege and good fortune should not be painted with such broad strokes, neither should we criminalise the condition of poverty, as is often done in both the media and popular discourse. The myth of our ability to raise ourselves out of poverty by dint of savvy and hard work is just that, a myth, which makes it easy for us to blame those mired in it as dumb, lazy, and yes, even criminal. These characterisations are counterproductive and allow us to ignore the real conditions which create poverty. As historian and author Rutger Bregman has so succinctly put it, “Poverty is not a lack of character; it is a lack of cash.” Art Nahill, Meadowbank