Three Cs of Covid risk
Better late than never, to start getting sound objective science into public health advice. I refer to close proximity in crowded, confined spaces; "The Three Cs".
Your editorial points about airconditioning and recirculated air (NZ Herald, January 30) are also spot on. Some "contrarians" have battled
to have this recognised, for the best part of the past year. Recognition is, er, "problematic".
A corollary to this is that fresh air and sunshine are risk mitigators; official "experts" calling for incarceration of the population in their own homes was a global-level disgrace that needs to be litigated. Also, a high number of workplaces are low-risk but restrictions often misguidedly indiscriminate.
And there is still another factor that the three Cs miss: a Big D. "Duration". What matters is viral load. Each factor contributes something to this. Being somewhere high-risk only briefly, will not result in a deadly viral load or even serious illness, but rather, asymptomatic development of immunity. Going by the evidence, no one actually dies from infection contracted over one drink, snack or shopping purchase.
But anywhere that people are there 24/7 can become an aerosol petri dish if ventilation is low-rate. Rest homes, prisons, apartment blocks under lockdown, quarantine centres.
Phil Hayward, Lower Hutt.
Snap 'appy
I read with interest the article about the pensioner's scanning misunderstanding and taking photos of QR codes (NZ Herald, January 29).
I think it is perfectly understandable for an older person to be confused and believe that they are doing the right thing.
We are constantly being reminded to "scan QR codes and turn Bluetooth tracing on" (there is in fact a full page of it opposite this article), but it seems to be taken for granted that we all know how to do it.
Robert Scoliège, Hamilton East.
Bank service
The letter from Kirby Malcolm (NZ Herald, January 29) echoed my own experience almost exactly the day before. A 45-minute wait, while the only two tellers dealt with complex banking issues is absolutely unacceptable.
Face-to-face service should be freely available. Privacy away from the queue waiting, rather than all present hearing personal financial business being discussed, is embarrassing.
The weasel words of the joys of being ANZ clients receiving wonderful service rings very hollow. Where is the service ? We are constantly told of the systems available online to conduct banking. However, for those unused to online use being able to have face-to-face service for some business is helpful.
The alternative of customers hanging interminably on the phone entertained with endless music, cutting costs by reducing staff and closing branches is not great customer service.
Daphne Hunt, Taupiri.
More people
In answer to CC McDowall's question regarding low wages (NZ Herald, February 1), high house prices and high immigration and whether our government has made the link or likes it that way.
The answer is, yes they have and yes they do.
Our government has a policy of rapid population increase by design but as Basil in Fawlty Towers said about "the war", we mustn't mention it.
J Leighton, Devonport.
Down town
As a fellow resident of Auckland Central, I fully agree with Annette Mills (NZ Herald, February 1) on her views of the city centre.
The one major issue that I wish to raise is that all efforts being made by the Auckland Council to make Auckland city more liveable, fails to include the 70,000 Auckland Central residents already residing here. All physical and financial efforts appear to go into trying to attract outsiders into the city.
If the council was to focus on making the central city environment more friendly for those of us who have made the decision to live within New Zealand's biggest city, perhaps those that do not live in the central area will become envious of our lifestyle and come and join us.
The options are "unlimited".
Dick Ayres, Auckland Central.