Covid rules: Sweet ride must end
So the PM is "frustrated", and the Minister of Health "disappointed". Hardly words to put fear into those who flout the rules.
Meanwhile, many thousands of business owners and event organisers across the country worry if they will survive another Auckland lockdown.
I am furious. The selfish,
or perhaps ignorant, few are risking the lives and livelihoods of many.
New Zealand's high-trust model is no longer working. When there are no consequences for rule breaches, fewer people obey the rules.
Enforcement, rather than being asked nicely, is all that some understand.
Sue Kurtovich, Tauranga.
Hefty fines needed
Covid-19 can easily be caught by accident and the team of 5 million accept this. Unfortunately, a few in that team ignore the rule to self-isolate when directed to do so. They continue to front at work, hold open homes and generally go where they want. They let the rest of us down hugely so there should be consequences.
Even the PM was riled. A hefty fine on exiting quarantine would be a deterrent for others not to follow their lead.
Kay Robinson, Henderson.
Softly softly approach fails
Why listen to the Government's stay-home order if there are no consequences in ignoring it. And why use the tracer app also if there are no consequences?
When it involves public safety, the Government must be more proactive and not soft on offenders. The soft approach is not working and we will continue to have frequent lockdowns.
Singapore is very clear on handling those who do not follow health authority orders and have many solid measures to prevent cases.
For Covid-19, we have to be hard to prevent it from occurring. Community safety is paramount to individual rights.
Chris Toh, Greenhithe.
Writers might have answers
The two columnists only seem to reinforce your paper's anti-everything attitude towards the Government and Covid management.
Heather du Plessis Allan continues to find any vehicle to attack Jacinda Ardern in encouraging Simon Bridges' attempts to discredit the police commissioner and therefore the PM by extension.
Perhaps more concerning is Kerry McIvor's article about Covid strategy. I am sure people sympathise with those losing income and "freedoms" but if you give encouragement in anyway to not follow guidelines even more people and businesses suffer, as evidenced by the return to level 3 today.
Can either columnist come up with a better way tackling the problem? If the high-trust model does not work (as it appeared in the latest case) what do they recommend?
Garry Bond, Hastings.
Feeling sorry won't work
Case M is 21, can vote, marry, make a baby, start a company or buy a house. They are not a minor with a partially developed sense of responsibility for the effect their actions might have on others. If case M had gone drink-driving they would have copped a financial penalty and received licence de-merit points.
The Government has allocated $400-$500 million to compensate businesses for lockdowns, so obviously the cost to the community of a lockdown is much higher than the risk of one drink driver, let alone the risk of causing a major outbreak. Yet the PM is reluctant to criminalise deliberate failure to comply with instructions that are designed to reduce the risk of spreading this virus. She prefers to feel sorry for people.
Andrew Westaway, Auckland.