Living room
With research proving that green space is necessary for mental health and the problems folk are having here now, it concerns me that trees are being taken down and buildings are virtually covering most of the sections being built on now.
In Canvas a week ago, there was an article
about a German architect, who was stated to be ahead of his time, who built his high-density housing in a horseshoe facing into a park. The residents were so happy, they were still there 20 years later - are we going backwards? What has happened to the margins between buildings and the right to sunlight? What happens to the stormwater? Where do children play? Surely we should have some basic design requirements?
E. Barclay, Takapuna.
Callous daze
Well said, Mary Hearn (NZ Herald, July 12). My wife and I have not yet had Covid and do not want it.
We rarely leave the house except for essential necessities such as doctors' visits and supermarkets.
It is no surprise to us that Covid-19 is gaining pace.
When we do go out, we see those who think that they know more than science.
Flouting the rules, no masks, no keeping a distance etc; What is it with them? Is it just anti-government; it won't happen to me; or just plain ignorance?
Eric Bennett, Red Beach.
Race relations
Simon Wilson (NZ Herald, July 12) is another of New Zealand's Champagne socialists who constantly thinks that wanting a country of equality is called "racism".
David Seymour is, in my opinion, speaking for a great many New Zealanders who are sick of the division that is being promoted by this Government and causing many to feel ostracised.
Having equality for all New Zealanders is not as he quotes "straight-out racism". It's called harmony.
John McOviney, Mt Maunganui.
Historic context
After reading Simon Wilson's article (NZ Herald, July 12), I felt I had to add my comment. Politicians supposedly targeting the disgruntled among those of European-descent seem blissfully ignorant of European constitutional traditions, in particular, the British constitutional traditions New Zealand is allegedly founded on.
The Crown never owned all the land in the UK. Shakespeare's histories refer to a land where the Crown is merely the largest land-holder, and the King must play nice. Cities held considerable rights on their own account, and the Crown had no right to interfere. A man's house is his castle means exactly that - the Crown and its agents have no automatic right to enter, but must apply, giving good and adequate reason.
Look at the Treaty of Waitangi in that light, and Queen Victoria is less overlord and more a UN Secretariat.
Things have changed since then of course, but the principle holds - where original title has not been extinguished, the rights belong and must be upheld.
It's bemusing - and amusing - that the people supposedly upholding the European traditions don't know what they are, or cherry-pick.
It calls for satire.
Wesley Parish, Tauranga.
Voting provision
Referring to Simon Wilson's critique (NZ Herald, July 12) of David Seymour and Act, I believe most Kiwis in our multi-ethnic society are happy to observe and respect in good faith all things Māori such as language, Matariki, traditions, Treaty partnership requirements and the like. But what they do not want to be undermined are the fundamental provisions of our valued democracy, i.e. universal suffrage and one person one vote at all levels of national and local government. There is a danger that the two threads may become mutually exclusive.
The onus is on our political masters to design their social engineering legislation to ensure this cannot ever happen. This Labour government is on dangerous ground.
Derek Smith, Newmarket.