Justice Minister Amy Adams has her fair share of door-knocking stories. She recalls visiting a home in 2008. It was a secluded house, the windows were blacked out and a "chemical smell" wafted out when the door opened. She waited a day or so to dob in what she suspected was a P-lab to police, lest those within linked the candidate in blue to a subsequent visit from officers in blue.
Her wariness was a perfectly human response to the situation at hand.
The review of domestic violence laws Adams has just released shows she has a quality few politicians exhibit let alone act on - the ability to process how humans actually act rather than how they would respond in an ideal world.
Many of the proposed changes cater to human behaviour rather than something that plays out well politically. Even more rare is her ability to go for the option that might work rather than the harder-line one that gets her a good hit in the headlines.
The first evidence of this was in her decision to hold off on introducing a conviction disclosure scheme that allows people to police-check their partners for any abuse convictions. Adams has not ruled this out but was sceptical about whether it would be used. Few people in the first flush of love would be clinical enough to undertake a warrant of fitness on their partner: the health check, the police check. Instead Adams settled for allowing police to quietly tip people off if their partner had such a record.