In the case of Brendan Horan and his expulsion from the New Zealand First caucus, Winston Peters yesterday cast himself in what for him are the unfamiliar roles of judge, jury and executioner.
For someone who would normally fight to the very death for someone's right to natural justice and "due process", the swift exorcism of Horan was Peters seemingly behaving very much out of character.
What the public has not witnessed is Peters' two-month-long struggle to get any kind of explanation from Horan as to why allegations he had misappropriated money belonging to his mother were false and malicious.
For Peters, loyalty is very much a two-way street. Few leaders are as generous in terms of loyalty to his troops as he is. An MP stuck in the mess Horan finds himself in could normally expect to enjoy Peters' backing until his or her claim of innocence is resolved one way or the other. But Peters had to move quickly for the party's sake.
The allegation that one of NZ First's MPs was stealing money from his elderly mother was something that went to the core of the party's reliance on superannuitants as a voter catchment.