It helps sometimes, before you get seized by the clamour of things and the frenzies of the moment, to pause and consider if the matter at hand deserves your emotional energy. Most things don't. On any given day, news is a vacuum into which significance must be poured and if whatever's around isn't truly significant, then whatever's available must be made to seem significant.
The trick for us poor stumblebums on the receiving end of a torrent of hyperbole is to sort the wheat from the dross. In an angst-happy world, there's no point getting all het up and hot and bothered and ringing talkback to say we've had a gutsful until we've applied a simple test to see if whatever it is we're having a gutsful about actually deserves the abdominal distendation.
The quickest way to rank the constant furies is to use a Scale of Significance, a Faff Filter, if you will, let's say from 1 to 10, where 1 defines things that are really no more important than having helmet hair or unwittingly breaking wind in the produce section of the supermarket and 10 is reserved for those rare and awful things that do redefine our world.
Unlike people, all events are not created equal, as a quick paddle in the shallows of this week's sea of troubles should demonstrate.
The lemon-lipped are back again, demanding more curbs, controls and strictures. Students in Dunedin, hormonally charged and splendidly irresponsible, have been drinking too much and setting fire to sofas, apparently. This has agitated the temperant. And some nebulous gaggle of academics, full clamped to the gummint's teat in terms of funding, has jumped on the overcrowded ban wagon to demand that smoking outdoors is prohibited forthwith.