Locking people up is an important part of our criminal justice system that has some positive benefits, but alone it is demonstrably deficient in solving such a complex social phenomenon. If we are to reduce reoffending, and thereby create fewer victims, crime must often be viewed not as the problem but as a symptom of a problem.
The idea of "social impact bonds", experimental and profit-based initiatives used to tackle social problems, has caused a stir. But if they are expanded into the realm of crime and justice, they neatly characterise this Government's approach.
A radical change in penal policy was signalled in 2011 when Bill English called prison "a moral and fiscal failure". Nothing focuses the mind on a prison population nearly 40 per cent higher than Australia's like a global financial crisis.
In 2012, the Government announced an ambitious goal to reduce reoffending by 25 per cent by 2017. Under the leadership of Corrections chief executive Ray Smith, laudable efforts have been made to reduce the chance of prisoners reoffending on release. Marry these ambitions with National's long-held faith in private prisons (around 20 per cent of prisoners are in prisons not run by the state) and the idea of social impact bonds are a natural fit.
Exactly how easy it will be to get people to invest in programmes to address reoffending is unclear but the canny investor may take guidance from a bunch of Christian do-gooders in Christchurch.