The timing couldn't be better for the release of a telling report from the World Trade Organisation about the explosion of protectionist measures implemented by its members since the beginning of the global economic crisis a year ago.
This week the leaders of the G20 nations meet in Pittsburgh in the US. A recent, informal meeting of Trade Ministers in India has given fresh impetus for ambassadors to the WTO to resume negotiations in Geneva that had earlier collapsed in disappointment.
Ambassadors can't successfully negotiate unless they have fresh and flexible mandates from capitals. It was smart to have the ministers' meeting in India, chaired by India's new Trade Minister. India and China have been the beneficiaries of globalisation over the past few decades and have seen hundreds of millions of their people lifted from extreme poverty. Other, less successful, developing countries look to them for leadership.
The Doha Development round, which was launched when I was Director General of the WTO, has the capacity, if concluded with real substance, to give the global economy a $1 trillion boost.
All win - especially the poor. As always, agriculture is a major difficulty. Rich countries spend $1 billion a day subsidising their farmers, which makes food dearer for their families.
However, this is not just an agricultural round and it's not just the rich countries that have to make compromises.
Every leader has to face angry constituencies who feel the immediate pain of new competition.
Some said you cannot make change when things are good. And things have been good - until the recent meltdown, the world enjoyed the most sustained period of global growth in history. More wealth has been created in the past 60 years than all of history put together.
When do you fix the roof? When the sun is shining or when it's raining? It has not been raining over the past 12 months; it's been a financial blizzard. Perhaps the economic crisis will focus leaders' minds, and the trade round will be concluded.
Trade negotiations have not stood still. The slower things are at the WTO and, if the multilateral system doesn't move ahead, the action moves to regional and bilateral deals.
Poor small countries are rarely involved. Agriculture and other sensitive issues are seldom addressed.
None of these deals have a binding disputes system. All create trade diversion and grant new privileges, and history shows that when the powerful get levers to use, they will one day use them. There's a cost to being left out, so we all do these deals, if we can.
Anti-globalisation forces have been emboldened by the global meltdown. It's not globalisation that people need to fear but de-globalisation, which is what a depression or recession means.
Low and slow growth threaten people's sense of security and they become vulnerable to evil forces of tribalism, racism, reaction, and protectionism. Unpleasant political forces emerge with seductive names such as Ukraine First, America First and NZ First.
The most amateur historian will concede that the last Great Depression was prolonged, made more lethal by competitive devaluations and protectionism, which caused global trade to collapse. From this misery came the twin tyrannies of last century - Fascism and Marxism.
Most leaders know what works and what doesn't. Their real challenge is balancing their domestic interests. It's called politics.
Congratulations to the WTO for being such a robust organisation that it can produce a report that criticises and exposes its most powerful 20 members. At the G20 meeting, hosted by President Obama, there is an opportunity to move ahead. Leaders have been named and shamed for breaking the spirit of the consensus at the last G20.
Just last week, the United States put a new tariff on imports of tyres from China; the Asian powerhouse, a few hours later, put up measures against imports of American chickens and vehicle parts.
The WTO report bravely exposes the 130 new measures that restrict trade that have been introduced over the past 12 months. Many will be the subject of the WTO's binding disputes system. This system is the jewel in the crown of international economic relations.
No country has ever refused to act on a ruling. It works but can be improved, yet even those technical improvements are locked inside the Doha Trade negotiations. Overloading this system, then blaming the WTO for its impartial legal rulings, could threaten the whole system.
The WTO risks becoming like a Mexican pinata that politicians can hit in the expectation of goodies, and pump up populist domestic reaction if they are found guilty. This is dangerous. It's time for the adults to take charge. I feel like going to the G20 with a placard that would read, "What would Roosevelt or Churchill do?"
* Mike Moore is a former Prime Minister of NZ and former Director General of the WTO. Visit his website at www.mike-moore.info
<i>Mike Moore:</i> Financial blizzard - time to fix roof
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.