KEY POINTS:
I just made my 20th visit to China. China will not come to change the modern world - it already has.
It has taken more than a million people a month out of extreme poverty over the past 20 years. It has lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty and now generates wealth, jobs and growth everywhere.
Over 1000 new vehicles are registered every hour. The new airport at Beijing will welcome, efficiently, over a million passengers a week. From being self-sufficient in energy 20 years ago, China is now the second biggest importer.
The increase in its energy demands over the past five years equals Japan's total energy consumption.
Wages in coastal China now exceed wages in the Philippines and Indonesia. Salaries were up 13 per cent last year in the Pearl River delta. New labour laws have raised wages and awareness of Chinese workers.
During the past year 1000 shoe factories have closed, and the Hong Kong Industry Federation expects up to 7000 Hong Kong-owned factories to close this year.
Many have moved inland in search of lower wages. Some are moving to Africa and Vietnam.
This trend shows the circular nature of wealth creation caused by globalisation. It was Japan in the 1950s, then Korea, Taiwan and now China and India.
As incomes grow, new opportunities open for poor countries.
It becomes their turn. Africa missed out on globalisation but is now catching up. There are now a million Chinese working in Africa.
African exports to China have increased by 40 per cent since 2002. Of the top 20 fastest growing economies in 2006, five are in Africa, three in the top 10.
As late as 1990, China's gross domestic product was US$390 billion ($486 billion), and Africa US$405 billion. Now China's economy is about five times bigger.
The largest-ever investment in Africa has been concluded by China into a South African bank. Africa is still home to the worst conditions but there's reason to hope and invest.
In 1999, Nigeria had fewer than 500,000 telephone subscribers, today 36 million. Political power there has imperfectly changed hands democratically twice.
Now that China is integrated into the world economy, it is facing the kind of threats to its reputation that all major mature nations face. Pressure is mounting about China's investments and arms sales to Sudan.
The appalling crisis in Dufar now needs China's intervention and good offices to put pressure on the Sudanese Government. It is beginning to.
Senior politicians in the US and Britain have publicly acknowledged that China is now working behind the scenes to nudge change.
The Olympics in Beijing are an opportunity for all sorts of causes to be raised, and China, like any other country, must respond. This is unfamiliar territory for China. It never had to care about global opinion before. Now it does.
Some of the criticism is unfair but that's the price of global integration. Reputation is everything.
When the grandmothers of America get scared about lead in toys they will not purchase from China. That's economic democracy - choice.
All this is splendid. It's a better world when we rely on one another for growth and success. Old-fashioned, discredited protectionist moods and methods are never far away.
Protectionism is raising its ugly reactionary head again in the US election campaign, and it's getting some traction. If it's this bad with 5 per cent unemployment, just imagine what it will be like with 10 per cent.
A new target is the so-called sovereign funds, mostly state-owned funds or state-influenced funds.
It's not just the resource-rich nations, it's state-owned pension funds, and the welcome fact that after the Asian crisis, most governments have prudently built up financial reserves.
More mature economies - Singapore, Norway, Australia and New Zealand - with ageing populations now have investment funds managed and influenced by governments.
That's good, but it poses new challenges.
China now has the world's largest monetary reserves, bigger than Japan's. Russia has billions in reserves.
A Russian group is trying to buy a Singapore-listed Chinese steelmaker. An Indian, British-based, now owns the biggest steel-making global conglomerate.
But when governments can back major commercial takeovers, questions will be asked.
There is a danger that governments can back their national champions now they are flush with cash.
What happens when a Chinese state-owned aluminium company moves into a bidding war for aluminium giants Rio Tinto, or BHP, Billiton who with Alcoa, are dancing around one of the biggest takeovers or mergers in commercial history?
These reserves must go somewhere; the money, in many cases, is welcome.
Countries from the United States to New Zealand have rebuffed investments from the Middle East, while investing madly themselves everywhere.
What's needed is transparency, global, predictable rules and standards. Eventually a global agreement on investment will be created.
When this was suggested a decade ago there was outrage by many anti-globalisation supporters. Many are now demanding action. They were wrong then, they are right now.
Over-reaction would be even worse. Capitalism and global financial movements have never faced such a situation before.
We have learned one thing - protectionism makes us all poorer, investment is a good thing. But there need to be predictable, transparent rules.
* Mike Moore is a former Prime Minister and director-general of the World Trade Organisation.
