NZ Herald
  • Home
  • Latest news
  • Herald NOW
  • Video
  • New Zealand
  • Sport
  • World
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Podcasts
  • Quizzes
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel
  • Viva
  • Weather

Subscriptions

  • Herald Premium
  • Viva Premium
  • The Listener
  • BusinessDesk

Sections

  • Latest news
  • New Zealand
    • All New Zealand
    • Crime
    • Politics
    • Education
    • Open Justice
    • Scam Update
  • Herald NOW
  • On The Up
  • World
    • All World
    • Australia
    • Asia
    • UK
    • United States
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Pacific
  • Business
    • All Business
    • MarketsSharesCurrencyCommoditiesStock TakesCrypto
    • Markets with Madison
    • Media Insider
    • Business analysis
    • Personal financeKiwiSaverInterest ratesTaxInvestment
    • EconomyInflationGDPOfficial cash rateEmployment
    • Small business
    • Business reportsMood of the BoardroomProject AucklandSustainable business and financeCapital markets reportAgribusiness reportInfrastructure reportDynamic business
    • Deloitte Top 200 Awards
    • CompaniesAged CareAgribusinessAirlinesBanking and financeConstructionEnergyFreight and logisticsHealthcareManufacturingMedia and MarketingRetailTelecommunicationsTourism
  • Opinion
    • All Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Editorials
    • Business analysis
    • Premium opinion
    • Letters to the editor
  • Politics
  • Sport
    • All Sport
    • OlympicsParalympics
    • RugbySuper RugbyNPCAll BlacksBlack FernsRugby sevensSchool rugby
    • CricketBlack CapsWhite Ferns
    • Racing
    • NetballSilver Ferns
    • LeagueWarriorsNRL
    • FootballWellington PhoenixAuckland FCAll WhitesFootball FernsEnglish Premier League
    • GolfNZ Open
    • MotorsportFormula 1
    • Boxing
    • UFC
    • BasketballNBABreakersTall BlacksTall Ferns
    • Tennis
    • Cycling
    • Athletics
    • SailingAmerica's CupSailGP
    • Rowing
  • Lifestyle
    • All Lifestyle
    • Viva - Food, fashion & beauty
    • Society Insider
    • Royals
    • Sex & relationships
    • Food & drinkRecipesRecipe collectionsRestaurant reviewsRestaurant bookings
    • Health & wellbeing
    • Fashion & beauty
    • Pets & animals
    • The Selection - Shop the trendsShop fashionShop beautyShop entertainmentShop giftsShop home & living
    • Milford's Investing Place
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • TV
    • MoviesMovie reviews
    • MusicMusic reviews
    • BooksBook reviews
    • Culture
    • ReviewsBook reviewsMovie reviewsMusic reviewsRestaurant reviews
  • Travel
    • All Travel
    • News
    • New ZealandNorthlandAucklandWellingtonCanterburyOtago / QueenstownNelson-TasmanBest NZ beaches
    • International travelAustraliaPacific IslandsEuropeUKUSAAfricaAsia
    • Rail holidays
    • Cruise holidays
    • Ski holidays
    • Luxury travel
    • Adventure travel
  • Kāhu Māori news
  • Environment
    • All Environment
    • Our Green Future
  • Talanoa Pacific news
  • Property
    • All Property
    • Property Insider
    • Interest rates tracker
    • Residential property listings
    • Commercial property listings
  • Health
  • Technology
    • All Technology
    • AI
    • Social media
  • Rural
    • All Rural
    • Dairy farming
    • Sheep & beef farming
    • Horticulture
    • Animal health
    • Rural business
    • Rural life
    • Rural technology
    • Opinion
    • Audio & podcasts
  • Weather forecasts
    • All Weather forecasts
    • Kaitaia
    • Whangārei
    • Dargaville
    • Auckland
    • Thames
    • Tauranga
    • Hamilton
    • Whakatāne
    • Rotorua
    • Tokoroa
    • Te Kuiti
    • Taumaranui
    • Taupō
    • Gisborne
    • New Plymouth
    • Napier
    • Hastings
    • Dannevirke
    • Whanganui
    • Palmerston North
    • Levin
    • Paraparaumu
    • Masterton
    • Wellington
    • Motueka
    • Nelson
    • Blenheim
    • Westport
    • Reefton
    • Kaikōura
    • Greymouth
    • Hokitika
    • Christchurch
    • Ashburton
    • Timaru
    • Wānaka
    • Oamaru
    • Queenstown
    • Dunedin
    • Gore
    • Invercargill
  • Meet the journalists
  • Promotions & competitions
  • OneRoof property listings
  • Driven car news

Puzzles & Quizzes

  • Puzzles
    • All Puzzles
    • Sudoku
    • Code Cracker
    • Crosswords
    • Cryptic crossword
    • Wordsearch
  • Quizzes
    • All Quizzes
    • Morning quiz
    • Afternoon quiz
    • Sports quiz

Regions

  • Northland
    • All Northland
    • Far North
    • Kaitaia
    • Kerikeri
    • Kaikohe
    • Bay of Islands
    • Whangarei
    • Dargaville
    • Kaipara
    • Mangawhai
  • Auckland
  • Waikato
    • All Waikato
    • Hamilton
    • Coromandel & Hauraki
    • Matamata & Piako
    • Cambridge
    • Te Awamutu
    • Tokoroa & South Waikato
    • Taupō & Tūrangi
  • Bay of Plenty
    • All Bay of Plenty
    • Katikati
    • Tauranga
    • Mount Maunganui
    • Pāpāmoa
    • Te Puke
    • Whakatāne
  • Rotorua
  • Hawke's Bay
    • All Hawke's Bay
    • Napier
    • Hastings
    • Havelock North
    • Central Hawke's Bay
    • Wairoa
  • Taranaki
    • All Taranaki
    • Stratford
    • New Plymouth
    • Hāwera
  • Manawatū - Whanganui
    • All Manawatū - Whanganui
    • Whanganui
    • Palmerston North
    • Manawatū
    • Tararua
    • Horowhenua
  • Wellington
    • All Wellington
    • Kapiti
    • Wairarapa
    • Upper Hutt
    • Lower Hutt
  • Nelson & Tasman
    • All Nelson & Tasman
    • Motueka
    • Nelson
    • Tasman
  • Marlborough
  • West Coast
  • Canterbury
    • All Canterbury
    • Kaikōura
    • Christchurch
    • Ashburton
    • Timaru
  • Otago
    • All Otago
    • Oamaru
    • Dunedin
    • Balclutha
    • Alexandra
    • Queenstown
    • Wanaka
  • Southland
    • All Southland
    • Invercargill
    • Gore
    • Stewart Island
  • Gisborne

Media

  • Video
    • All Video
    • NZ news video
    • Herald NOW
    • Business news video
    • Politics news video
    • Sport video
    • World news video
    • Lifestyle video
    • Entertainment video
    • Travel video
    • Markets with Madison
    • Kea Kids news
  • Podcasts
    • All Podcasts
    • The Front Page
    • On the Tiles
    • Ask me Anything
    • The Little Things
  • Cartoons
  • Photo galleries
  • Today's Paper - E-editions
  • Photo sales
  • Classifieds

NZME Network

  • Advertise with NZME
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • BusinessDesk
  • Newstalk ZB
  • Sunlive
  • ZM
  • The Hits
  • Coast
  • Radio Hauraki
  • The Alternative Commentary Collective
  • Gold
  • Flava
  • iHeart Radio
  • Hokonui
  • Radio Wanaka
  • iHeartCountry New Zealand
  • Restaurant Hub
  • NZME Events

SubscribeSign In
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Home / New Zealand

<i>Dialogue:</i> Why gay video ban was unjustified

7 Sep, 2000 10:11 PM5 mins to read

Subscribe to listen

Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen.
Already a subscriber?  Sign in here

Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech.
‌
Save

    Share this article

By GRANT HUSCROFT*

The urge to censor is strong indeed, and quite understandable. As American Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes once observed: "If you have no doubt of your premises or your power and want a certain result with all your heart, you naturally express your wishes in law and
sweep away all opposition."

This is perhaps the best explanation for the decision of the Film and Literature Board of Review, which purported to ban two videos that a church group wanted to show its members.

The American videos, Aids: What You Haven't Been Told and Gay Rights/Special Rights: Inside the Homosexual Agenda, were banned by the board following a request by the Human Rights Action Group.

Among other things, according to the board, the videos wrongly linked homosexual orientation with the spread of HIV; represented homosexuals, bisexuals, and people with HIV as inherently inferior; and misrepresented the effect of prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

In sum, the board considered that the videos were injurious to the public good. Clearly, the board hated these videos and the opinions they expressed.

Last week, however, five justices of the Court of Appeal unanimously quashed the board's decision and remitted the matter to the board for reconsideration. The result of that reconsideration is inevitable: the videos cannot be banned.

Indeed, so obvious is this outcome that one member of the court, Justice Thomas, held that there was no point allowing the board to reconsider its decision; it could not possibly ban the videos in accordance with the law.

The surprising thing is that these videos were ever banned in the first place. The first video, made in 1989, discusses the spread of Aids and includes interviews with a congressman and a number of healthcare professionals. It criticises homosexual conduct in relation to the Aids crisis, and argues that there is no such thing as safe sex.

The second video, made in 1993, expresses the view that American law should not be amended to ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. That is a matter of political interest in the United States, and the video includes interviews with a US senator and a former Attorney-General.

To be sure, the opinions expressed in the videos are controversial. Some are offensive, especially to the gay community. But neither the controversial nature of an opinion nor its offensiveness justifies censorship, let alone an order banning a video.

The Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act, 1993, allows censorship only of videos that deal with matters such as sex, horror, crime, cruelty or violence in such a manner as to be injurious to the public good. The act is, in general, concerned with preventing the publication of harmful activities. There is no power to censor or ban videos based on disapproval of the opinions they express.

Even assuming that the board had the power to ban these videos, it would have been required to exercise that power in the light of the right to freedom of expression in the Bill of Rights Act, and it failed to do so. The board thought that freedom of expression was subordinated to its goal of eliminating discrimination, and used its powers in an attempt to prevent people from forming opinions and attitudes it considered wrong.

In doing so, the board made a major case out of two dated and insignificant videos. It distorted the content of the videos, attributing misinformation to the videos that did not exist, while invoking its expert judgment to criticise opinions expressed in the videos as inaccurate factual information.

The board's decision left the impression that the videos were akin to Nazi propaganda. Unfortunately, that impression has been picked up by some in the media and it has been suggested that in overturning the board's decision the Court of Appeal has protected "hate propaganda."

For those who have seen the videos, rather than relied upon the board's description of them, the truth is far less sinister. The videos express religion-based opposition to gay rights in the US, a view that is mainstream in that country. At the same time, however, Christians are encouraged to love homosexuals as people.

As Justice Thomas noted, while he did not condone the contents of the videos or endorse the view that their publication was in the public good, neither did he accept that they were blatant bigotry or hate propaganda. In any event, most New Zealanders are likely to disagree with the some or all of the opinions expressed in the videos. But the board was not willing to leave that to chance, and as a result banned their exhibition in this country.

Incredibly, the Attorney-General and the Human Rights Commission officials who are supposed to be concerned with protecting rights intervened in the case in an attempt to support the ban.

As for the gay community, its support for the ban is short-sighted. Minority groups have everything to fear from censorship and almost nothing to gain.

The political successes enjoyed by the gay community in decriminalisation of homosexual conduct and the establishment of protection from discrimination in the Human Rights Act could not have occurred without the freedom to express opinions that were controversial, and remain controversial for some.

Tolerance is required if we are to be a free society, and it is a tall order. Gays must tolerate opposition to gay rights, just as Christians must tolerate demands for gay rights. It is as simple as that.The last thing anyone needs is censorship of this sort.

* Grant Huscroft is a senior lecturer in the faculty of law at the University of Auckland.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Save

    Share this article

Latest from New Zealand

Politics

No, Jacinda Ardern hasn’t been asked to appear before the Covid Royal Commission

08 Jul 05:41 AM
New Zealand|christchurch

Golden retriever rescued after being stuck on a cliff

New ZealandUpdated

Watch: Dramatic rescue mission to save pet dog trapped down cliff

08 Jul 05:00 AM

From early mornings to easy living

sponsored
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Latest from New Zealand

Golden retriever rescued after being stuck on a cliff

Golden retriever rescued after being stuck on a cliff

Two-year-old golden retriever Remmy rescued after being stuck on a cliff for two hours. Video / George Heard

Watch: Dramatic rescue mission to save pet dog trapped down cliff

Watch: Dramatic rescue mission to save pet dog trapped down cliff

08 Jul 05:00 AM
'Unprecedented' changes around Antarctic have implications for NZ

'Unprecedented' changes around Antarctic have implications for NZ

08 Jul 04:55 AM
Police search for Michael Tautari, urge public not to approach him

Police search for Michael Tautari, urge public not to approach him

08 Jul 04:36 AM
Solar bat monitors uncover secrets of Auckland’s night sky
sponsored

Solar bat monitors uncover secrets of Auckland’s night sky

NZ Herald
  • About NZ Herald
  • Meet the journalists
  • Newsletters
  • Classifieds
  • Help & support
  • Contact us
  • House rules
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Competition terms & conditions
  • Our use of AI
Subscriber Services
  • NZ Herald e-editions
  • Daily puzzles & quizzes
  • Manage your digital subscription
  • Manage your print subscription
  • Subscribe to the NZ Herald newspaper
  • Subscribe to Herald Premium
  • Gift a subscription
  • Subscriber FAQs
  • Subscription terms & conditions
  • Promotions and subscriber benefits
NZME Network
  • The New Zealand Herald
  • The Northland Age
  • The Northern Advocate
  • Waikato Herald
  • Bay of Plenty Times
  • Rotorua Daily Post
  • Hawke's Bay Today
  • Whanganui Chronicle
  • Viva
  • NZ Listener
  • Newstalk ZB
  • BusinessDesk
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • iHeart Radio
  • Restaurant Hub
NZME
  • About NZME
  • NZME careers
  • Advertise with NZME
  • Digital self-service advertising
  • Book your classified ad
  • Photo sales
  • NZME Events
  • © Copyright 2025 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP