Warning: The Grace Millane murder trial is hearing evidence of a graphic and sexual nature. Reader discretion is advised. The trial is taking place in open court and media are required to accurately report the evidence as it is presented.
The man accused of Grace Millane's murder spent 5-10 minutes strangling her and then took "trophy" photos of her body, the Crown has told the jury during its closing argument.
The accused then created a "labyrinth of storytelling and lies" and calmly disposed of her body and other evidence, the court heard today.
The Crown has now completed its closing argument and this afternoon the defence will address the jury.
Crown prosecutors allege that on December 1 last year - the eve of Millane's 22nd birthday - the accused strangled her to death in his CityLife hotel apartment in downtown Auckland.
Tomorrow, Justice Simon Moore will provide his summary of the case and directions to the jury.
'It was an accidental death' - defence
5.30pm
Defence lawyer Ian Brookie said the jury was not able to resolve the issue about Millane's time of death.
There just was no evidence, he said.
"What is the evidence of time of death, when is the time of death?"
All the Crown could point towards, Brookie said, were "two random Google searches".
"Where's the searching about how to create a fictional defence of asphyxiation during sex?"
Brookie provided a theory for the first time in the trial that the searches on the accused's phone for "Waitakere Ranges" and "hottest fire" at about 1.30am may have been part of "drunken conversations" between his client and Millane.
"Now a search at 7.05am in the morning for rigor mortis, that's different," he said.
The explicit photos of Millane were a "very sensitive and emotional subject" for the jurors, but Brookie said there was no evidence to suggest she was dead when they were taken.
"Where's the expert evidence from the Crown asking 'are these photographs of a deceased person?'."
Finally, Brookie said, there was the suggestion of a motive - which the Crown introduced for the first time today.
The motive, Brookie said the Crown now claimed, was to take explicit photos of dead people.
"That is just implausible," he said. "The suggestion that someone would go to all that effort ... Frankly ridiculous."
Brookie told the jury they may come to the question of manslaughter for the accused, which Justice Moore will direct them on tomorrow.
"Everything's fine, you carry on," Brookie said of a man trying to cover up a sudden death.
The accused was described by his date as being "calm, intense and aloof".
"It's crazy how guys can make one wrong move and go to jail for the rest of their life ... he got done for manslaughter," the accused told her, speaking of a "friend" who was convicted in a case of fatal erotic asphyxiation.
Brookie said: "How can you be aloof, intense and calm at the same time? Manslaughter, jail for the rest of his life... Interesting, he's talking about manslaughter not murder."
The lawyer said this was the first admission about what happened in that CityLife hotel room.
"Is anyone going to believe this? The window for reporting this accidental death is closing fast."
Brookie told the jury a critical mistake from the accused was "throwing away Miss Millane's phone" - which may have had intimate photos on it, further corroborating his story that the pair took nude images of each other.
4.20pm
Brookie said at whatever time the accused found Millane had died it proved to be a "pivot point" which broke a chain of logic.
"He lied and tried to cover it up, there's no dispute about that," he told the jury.
But in a high-stress situation such as an accidental death, Brookie said "people get it wrong".
"He did that because he feared he wouldn't be believed.
Brookie said there was no evidence from the accused's apartment which was inconsistent with what his client told police.
There was no evidence of any disturbance or fight, the defence lawyer told the jury.
"At first blush it may have looked like there was quite a lot of blood," Brookie said of the luminol tests which showed lit up large circles on the hotel room floor.
But this was consistent with cleaning up "a small amount of blood", he said, which the accused admitted to.
The accused claims he woke on the morning of December 2 to find Millane lying on the floor - between the fridge and the bed - with blood coming from her nose.
Brookie said Dianne Crenfeldt, an expert forensic scientist from the Institute of Environmental Science and Research, couldn't be certain how much blood there was.
"At best she could say it's more than a few drops," Brookie said.
3.25pm
This was also "not one of those cases where lies told by the defendant are completely blown out of the water" by the medical evidence, he said.
He told the jury the experts couldn't give a firm time frame for how long it takes for manual strangulation to lead to death.
"No one can tell you how long this takes," Brookie said.
The Crown's expert pathologist, Dr Simon Stables, also failed to see any significant injuries when he performed his autopsy on Millane, he added.
It was only after Stables was provided with the accused's narrative of rough sex that he revised his conclusion to pressure on the neck being the cause of death.
But it was alcohol, Brookie continued, which is "really what made the difference here" and led to an unexpected, unforeseen accident for an otherwise healthy young woman.
"This is not at all the same as a domestic violence case where you have a partner attacking another partner and the victim fighting back," Brookie said.
While in the dark and in the heat of the moment, Millane may have passed out, Brookie said.
"She may have, for a brief period of time, gone unconscious and he may not have noticed," he added.
But he warned the jury and said: "A person who is being strangled against their will, will fight.
"They will fight in any way they can, including in their neck, in their muscles. The basic human drive is to fight."
Brookie said there was no sign of any resistance or any defensive injuries that would normally appear in strangulation cases.
3.00pm
Brookie turned to the evidence of Millane's interest in BDSM (Bondage Discipline Sadism and Masochism).
"There's a body of evidence that makes that abundantly clear," he said. "More young people are dabbling in these sorts of activities. They're getting into breath play, as it's called."
Brookie said further evidence of this came from Millane when she sent a message to her best friend about her date saying: "I click with him so well."
So far, the lawyer said, "his story checks out completely".
2.35pm
Brookie then turned his attention to the accused's police interview from December 8 last year.
"He didn't have to talk," Brookie said. "He did, he chose to, not only did he choose to, he assisted the police in finding [Millane's body]. He told them in a fairly disorganised download of information ... It just all came tumbling out."
Brookie said the police "didn't drill down into the details".
Ian Brookie, the accused's chief defence lawyer, has begun his closing address.
He told the jury this was an important case.
"You, no doubt as all of us will, want to get this right," he said.
He said anger, emotion, morals, prejudice and sympathy had no place in them reaching their verdict.
"Some of those may be in play - they will distract you from your task.
"It was an accidental death that took place during sexual activity, that if done incorrectly or while intoxicated can go wrong," Brookie said of Millane's death.
When confronted with Millane's lifeless body, Brookie said his client "freaked out".
"He reacted badly," he said. "He acted selfishly."
But, when thinking logically, Brookie asked if the accused's actions in the minutes, hours and days following Millane's death helped them with the critical issue.
"What he wanted to do, what he was trying to do, when Miss Millane asked him to put his hands around her neck to give her sexual pleasure," he said.
The accused, the defence lawyer continued, did not cope when faced with the crisis of Millane's death and took steps to try and avoid what "looked so bad".
"The stakes were high here," Brookie said. "Once committed to that course he had to follow it through, he had to make it look like everything was fine."
"There's not mounting bodies in the streets because someone has touched their neck during a bit of rough sex," Dickey said.
While Millane "had a modest interest" BDSM, Dickey said "so what?"
"She didn't ask to be killed.
"You can't ask to be killed in this country, you can't consent to murder."
Dickey said it was "not safe sex play that killed Grace Millane, it's strangulation".
"You can't consent to your own murder ... She would have had to consent to someone holding her neck for five to 10 minutes until she passes out ... That's just silly."
"It's a sexual interest, it's power and it's control," he said, adding it risks women's lives.
Dickey told the jury the accused had shown a propensity for this, highlighting the evidence of one of the accused's Tinder dates in November last year who said she was suffocated during sex.
"[She] fought for her life and survived, Grace Millane did not. Both were restrained," Dickey said.
11.20am
Dickey said the accused "started to get a bit worried" about the time he had to hide Millane's body.
He also claimed he had a boozy night at a Queen St pub which didn't sell Corona or Heineken, Dickey said.
"This is elaborate stuff."
During a police interview when Detective Ewen Settle says Millane may have died from foul play the accused "obviously thinks 'hmmm, better put on a good show about this'," Dickey said.
"He's trying to get away with it altogether.
"He killed the British tourist and that's murder in his own mind."
Dickey said the accused created a "labyrinth of storytelling and lies".
What the accused did, however, suggests he had a different view of Millane, Dickey said.
"Does it suggest he's killed her and he's okay with that?"
The first thing the accused did, Dickey said, was to Google 'Waitakere Ranges' at 1.29am on December 2.
"He's trying to figure out a way of disposing of her body, that's his first response. Second response is then to look up 'hottest fire' - again to figure out how to dispose her body.
"So that the world will never learn that he has killed this young woman."
About 10 minutes later the accused began viewing porn before taking several photos of Millane between 1.46am and 1.49am.
The accused was "cool, calm and controlled", Dickey said.
"Cool as a cucumber."
At 7.17am the accused searches for the nearest Warehouse, and at 7.51am he messages a Tinder match to check that their date is still on for later in the day.
"This is not sex play, this is not restricted breath games," he said.
"This is holding a person's neck or throat for an extended period of time, feeling their struggle, as she must have struggled for her life, and you carry on.
"You do not have to plan murder, you do not have to intend murder."
The prosecutor told the jury that after Millane was dead the accused began taking photographs of her naked body.
"We know he has a sexual interest in feet, he took that as well," he said, pointing towards the photos recovered from the accused's phone.
The prosecutor said the accused gripped Millane's throat for five to 10 minutes, strangling the life out of her.
"At some point in that period the victim would pass through to unconsciousness and you would have to carry on. And you would have to carry on to cause death ... suffocating her, strangling her, for a total of what would be approximately five to 10 minutes."
He said the accused must have felt Millane's "limp and lifeless" body but decided to carry on.
"If that's not reckless murder in this country ladies and gentleman, then someone will have to explain to me what is," Dickey said.
"On that alone you will have to convict him of murder."