Fast food is not new - the ruins of Pompei contain about 120 fast food takeaway restaurants. Clearly the concept has evolved a lot during the past centuries - and we are now on the cusp of being able to 'print' foods containing whatever nutrients we want, in any shape we want.
If we look at food trends over history, we can see an evolution linked closely to technology. One hundred years ago we had little choice but to eat local, in-season, fresh, pesticide-free, zero-carbon food. Unfortunately it was also often half-rotten, sometimes adulterated, frequently dangerous and in limited supply. It was boring and expensive, and in winter you could starve. Mechanisation and industrial fertilisers brought copious, cheap farm produce. Processing made it safe and transportable.
Commerce made it interesting. Today, you can have any ethnic style at any time of year in any place in the world. It is 10,000 times less likely to contain bad bugs. It will not be adulterated with unexpected products, but may contain some of a limited number of permitted additives, themselves nearly all foods in their own right in one culture or another. This move to processing has been a massive trend - big enough to spawn a counter-trend: local, in-season, fresh, organic, zero-carbon.
Every generation has developed technology. And each generation has found more and more uses for the technology of the last. There seems to be a physical law that says a technology tends to leak into every application possible over time. Three-dimensional printing is becoming prevalent in a number of industries, but is only just emerging in food.
Perhaps one hundred different companies will end up making 3D food printers in the future, but only about 30 will dominate the manufacture of edible food inks and perhaps ten will dominate the algorithms needed to print the food.