McDonald's were offering a guarantee of 80 per cent of rostered hours. The union found that unpalatable, hence the strikes yesterday.
McDonald's were offering a guarantee of 80 per cent of rostered hours. The union found that unpalatable, hence the strikes yesterday.
I CAN appreciate the nervousness involved with "zero hours" contracts, which were the subject of protest at McDonald's restaurants yesterday.
My personal view is that the most successful people in the world, in terms of business and employment opportunities, are usually those who are indifferent to whatever hours they workin order to further their ambition and credibility. Those who are confident and mean to make their mark on the world in big letters will not care if they arrive at work before anyone else and work later than anyone else. Although nobody is impervious to a possible job loss, these people are usually favoured.
The question is then asked: why should a person have to work harder than what they are contracted in order to survive? This is why unions are in place, to protect workers from unreasonable management expectations.
Zero hours means a business can alter an employee's hours, right down to zero if they want. It's effectively an "on-call" situation. It might suit a student or casual worker, but is somewhat unfair to people who depend on a regular income and would not survive on that kind of uncertainty.
McDonald's were offering a guarantee of 80 per cent of rostered hours. The union found that unpalatable, hence the strikes yesterday.
The conflict between employers and unions is long-running, with employers quite honestly wanting workers who work hard and take pride in what they do, and would encourage those who want to demonstrate a harder work ethic. The union has the view that employers, watching the money and the balance sheets, will take advantage whenever they can.
If you are about to enter the workforce, it is worth remembering that you actually have more control over your work situation than you realise. It is easy to surrender, in fatalistic fashion, to the whims of management, or the direction of your union, both of whom will say they have your interests at heart. But no-one sees their life and work in the same way you do. There is nothing wrong with deciding that your method of working is, by your choice, going to be a high standard. Ambition and goals are good. You decide.
