Bill English has changed gear. The tenor of his Budget yesterday has moved from the hard grind of recovery to the cruise gear of normal economic growth, albeit lower than the heights we previously enjoyed. The change is welcome if it gives business a similar outlook but the road ahead does not appear quite as smooth as the Finance Minister would have us believe.
He notes the economy grew 3 per cent last year, "almost the same as Australia and higher than almost every other developed country". But the Treasury forecasts an average of just 2.5 per cent growth over the next five years as farms rebuild their stock following the recent drought and the dollar remains high in relation to currencies of countries that are still living on monetary stimulants.
A projected fall in unemployment to 5.2 per cent by 2017 depends, yet again, on the Christchurch rebuild. Estimates of its total cost have risen to $40 billion, of which the Government will bear $15 billion. Despite that, Mr English expects to budget for a surplus next year.
If he can, it will be a considerable achievement. The Treasury projected 10 years of deficits and rising debt when the Government came to power in the global financial crisis. That was before the Canterbury earthquakes. To have brought the Budget to this point is a considerable achievement in spending control, reducing the state from 35 per cent of the country's economic activity two years ago to a projected 31 per cent next year.
With a surplus in sight, Mr English has warned the grip will not be relaxed. He reinforced that message in the Budget by announcing that contributions to the "Cullen fund" for national superannuation will not now resume until he reaches his net debt reduction target in 2020/21. Need the fund wait so long?