Editorial: National has too many contenders for comfort

Editorial

With no fewer than five contenders for their leadership, National MPs are facing a difficult decision in, or before, their caucus meeting next Tuesday.

They will be hoping the race has narrowed before Tuesday. To go into the meeting with five candidates means it might take four ballots to find the leader by a process of elimination and that is not ideal. It is not the enthusiastic mandate a political leader needs.

More than a week after Bill English announced his departure, the party ought to have a clear succession taking shape by now. But as yet none of those who want the job appear to have overwhelming caucus support as far as the public can see.

That includes Steven Joyce who would be the natural successor if National was still in power. Joyce delayed his entry until Tuesday having seen none of the first three nominees, Judith Collins, Simon Bridges and Amy Adams, take a clear lead.

By then the little-known Mark Mitchell was trying his luck too. But there does not appear to be a groundswell for Joyce as yet either.

National MPs have a difficult choice because they have to decide whether their prospects of winning the next election are better served by offering continuity or change.

Joyce and Adams, as high ranking ministers in the previous Government, represent continuity.

Collins, Bridges and Mitchell in their different ways offer change.

Collins is offering a change of both style and substance. Her style is direct, confrontational, uncompromising and she would reposition National with a conservative emphasis after the liberal directions taken by English and Sir John Key.

Bridges offers generational change, by which he means more than his youthful physical features. He is expressing "blue-green" concerns hitherto unsuspected in a former Energy Minister who argued for oil exploration. Mitchell, the least experienced MP in the field, offers a clean slate to the public.

Normally there would be no question a party relegated to Opposition would be looking for change.

But National has not lost power in the normal way. It is the largest party in Parliament and its economic record is enviable. Under Joyce National would be a constant and credible check on the Government's economic and fiscal performance.

Under Adams the party might make more compromises with the Government's direction.

History says that unless the Government is very unlucky, or makes some big economic mistakes, it will probably be re-elected at least once. The odds will be against National's next leader winning the 2020 election whoever the MPs choose.

For the younger contenders this leadership contest might be a good one to lose. They have put their name into consideration for the future.

They could withdraw this time, perhaps settling for the post of deputy to Joyce or Collins, or the finance role.

Collins would be the favourite if National's core supporters were making the decision.

Many of them say they like her style and would welcome a more combative Opposition.

National's MPs might not be so comfortable with it but they need to make up their collective mind, preferably before Tuesday.