On one level, it is easy to see why the InterCity bus terminal was a condition of the resource consent for the SkyCity casino. It provided a public-service dimension that would help to placate, if only slightly, the anti-gambling lobby. On any other level, however, the terminal's location makes no sense. It is far removed from the train, ferry and suburban bus connections and offers virtually no parking for those dropping off passengers. To compound those woes, it is a cheerless place occupying a dark corner of the casino complex.
At some stage, the terminal should be shifted to a site more suited to the interests of those who use InterCity's service. SkyCity suggests that time is now, as it sets about the development of its $402 million convention centre. Its chief executive, Nigel Morrison, says Britomart would be a better place because InterCity buses would then link with other transport modes. He is right, of course, but, as he surely knows, Britomart is already overloaded with buses.
If that is not an option, it is surely possible to come up with a better location than SkyCity. But that place must be found and all the prerequisites for its development - as part of a comprehensive overhaul of bus departure points - settled before the casino operator is released from the condition of its resource consent.
Only in that way will the interests of the travelling public be served, as well as those of SkyCity.
