The 40 designs selected this week from more than 10,000 proposals have given some focus to the question of whether we should change our national flag. It has been hard to find much enthusiasm among the public thus far, and that remains true since the publication of the Flag Consideration Panel's "long list".
It seems that among the 40 there is not one so striking, so compelling, that we cannot resist it. We should settle for nothing less if we are going to change the flag.
Too many of the panel's first selection look like they were not only chosen by a committee, but designed by one.
The designs strain to put as many national symbols as possible into the picture. A fern and stars combination is popular, though the two do not look comfortable together. A koru and stars feature on others, to no better effect.
The panel has clearly been guided heavily by public offerings. A surprisingly large proportion of the 10,292 suggestions included the Southern Cross much as it is on the existing flag. That possibly reflected a wish to keep change to a minimum rather than a strong identification with the constellation we share with the rest of the hemisphere.