On Monday we released the third Child Poverty Monitor. The Monitor's purpose is to inform the public of the extent and impact of children growing up in poverty in New Zealand. So why is the public the audience for this data, rather than Government?
In 2012 my Expert Advisory Group on Solutions to Child Poverty made 78 recommendations, predominantly aimed at Government, that would halve child poverty, if implemented fully.
Since then, Government has implemented about a third of the recommendations. For example, insulation of state owned and private rental housing has continued, investment in early childhood education now tops $1 billion a year and we have free health care for children under 13. In April benefits will increase by $25/ week for families with children. Clearly, there is much more to be done, including the need for a comprehensive plan for reducing child poverty. But we are starting to see action and that is a good thing.
Perhaps even more important than the recommendations acted on, there is now a clearer understanding by public servants and ministers of the impacts on children of growing up in poverty, and there is much stronger public understanding of the extent the problem. Poverty and inequality were among the top concerns of intending voters before the last election.
Public support for investing in children matters. Governments invest where there is a public will and mandate, or they get voted out. Children can't vote, so we need adults to champion their interests. When money is tight, we may need to make trade-offs to make this investment in our children and our future. What are we prepared to give up, so that Government can prioritise children?