"In a right-of-way off Filleul St a terrace of half a dozen two-storey brick buildings is erected parallel with a brick wall at the back of which six feet of space separates the buildings and in this sunless alley six privies connected directly with the sewer, untrapped, emit a pestilential odour. The apology for a back-yard is paved with bricks. These however, are subsiding, into what I did not care to investigate."
Residents of the country's largest city were in no position to turn up their noses at Dunedin's filth, however. In May 1900, the author of one report noted: "The sanitation of Auckland is sadly neglected. Its drainage must be systematised, the unsanitary dwellings pointed out by the Premier and others must be improved out of existence. The city refuse must be burnt instead of collecting in festering heaps. The citizens must be provided with pure and copious water for their household needs."
Central Auckland's congested housing - in which around 35,000 people lived in an area of just 16sq km - presented an ideal setting for disease to develop and spread. If these reported circumstances are anything to go by, the lustre of late-Victorian villa-lined suburbs - lionised by later generations - must have been tarnished for those residents who had no choice but to put up with the stench of accumulated rubbish, leaking sewage, putrefying waste, and the inevitable rodent infestations that thrived in these environments.
It is little wonder that typhoid, polio, diphtheria and a host of other diseases took people's lives in unusually high numbers in the country's cities at the beginning of the 20th century. Just how badly the situation had deteriorated was made apparent when the most notorious of all infections paid a mercifully brief visit to New Zealand. In 1900, one Aucklander was killed by the plague. Two years later, a further three residents in the capital succumbed to the disease.
Improvements to housing eventually occurred, but they were evolutionary rather than revolutionary. The major advance took place in 1935, when the Government issued its Manual of Instructions for Conducting Housing Surveys, which specified standards for homes.
The fabric of the house was to be "sound, clean, and in a good state of repair", and the appropriate sanitary facilities, paths, and ceiling heights were laid out in the guidelines. If the houses were not in good condition, inspectors had to report on whether they could be repaired or were better off being demolished.
There was even a prescription for the desirable number of residents for each house. A dwelling was overcrowded "if the number of persons sleeping in the house is such that any two of those persons, being persons 10 years old or more of opposite sexes and not being persons living together as husband and wife, must sleep in the same bedroom". Eighty years on, it's still not much to ask for.
Dr Paul Moon is Professor of History at Auckland University of Technology.