The Government enters its final week of the year, a shake-up for the capital’s transport plans and 30C-plus temperatures expected across the country in the latest NZ Herald headlines.
Video / NZ Herald
GP and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder expert Tony Hanne was before the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal today that will decide his punishment for prescribing drugs such as ritalin without the required approval of a specialist.
He maintains without his actions, his patients would never have got the help they needed in a broken system.
But prosecutor Belinda Johns said that was no excuse, that Hanne was dealing with potentially dangerous class B controlled drugs.
“Dr Hanne touts himself as an expert and a leader in the treatment of ADHD but single-handedly dismissed the laws within which such treatment must be provided,” Johns said.
Family doctors can prescribe ADHD medication but each patient must get separate approval from a paediatrician or psychiatrist every two years.
Doctor Tony Hanne is now in his 80s and has transferred most of his patients to other GPs.
Hanne was successfully prosecuted last year after working with a psychiatrist who effectively rubber-stamped the approvals without seeing or speaking to Hanne’s patients.
Hanne said at the time it was to make sure they got the help they needed because many could not access specialist care due to a shortage of doctors - or sometimes the expense.
Johns told today’s hearing Hanne’s behaviour was unlawful and dangerous and if he thought the system was broken, he should have used his position to lobby for change.
“He just chose to ignore what he did not like or agree with,” she said.
But Hanne’s lawyer Harry Waalkens KC argued it would be gross and unreasonable to stop him from practising.
He was now in his 80s and had transferred most of his patients to other GPs but loved his work and still wanted to keep practising, mainly to give expert advice.
Waalkens said ADHD could have huge consequences for patients, families and communities if left untreated and everything Hanne had done was for his patients.
He noted that, unlike other medical prosecutions, no harm had been done to any patients, instead dozens had written references of support.
Hanne had helped thousands of people over the years, Waalkens said.
“Not one patient has complained, there is not one piece of evidence of anyone being harmed. How can they suggest he be suspended?” he said.
Prosecutor Johns said Hanne showed no remorse or insight that what he did was wrong.
