As Police Armed Response teams are scrapped, the Defence Minister is calling for an independent review into why frontline officers were armed with military grade-assault rifles in the first place.
Ron Mark said he holds "great concern" at the lack of firearms training officers receive and was aware police complaints about their own training had been dismissed at the highest levels.
"Even our military cadets that go through more rigorous training than frontline police officers," the NZ First MP said.
"It's time to reconsider the decision to put military grade assault rifles into the hands of frontline police in the streets of suburban New Zealand."
As thousands of New Zealanders marched in solidarity with anti-racism movements across the world, sparked by the death of George Floyd at the hands of a white police officer, Mark said it was time to rethink arming police.
Added to the fact that the Government has confiscated all semi-automatic weapons in the buy back scheme, Mark said police were inappropriately armed against members of the public.
"We have always held concerns with the creeping militarisation of the police force given the Government already has multiple layers of armed response, across agencies.
"Frontline officers have the ability to be armed at the discretion of their immediate supervisors.
Reports from early stages of the trial also show the armed officers were routinely attending low-level incidents including routine traffic stops, and police recording of data was "exceedingly poor".
Data showed that the controversial ARTs trial were attending callouts to children as young as 12 during the trial.
Armed officers dealt with six incidents involving a total of eight 12-year-olds - seven of whom were Māori. The other 12-year-old's ethnicity was reported "unknown".
Almost all of the incidents took place in Hamilton.
None of the 12-year-olds had firearms, but three of them were listed as having a weapon, only identified as cutting, stabbing or striking.