READ MORE:
• Premium - David Cormack: Why Phil Twyford must go from Cabinet
• Premium - David Cormack: The rise of Green Power
• Premium - David Cormack: Jacinda Ardern's international reputation tops political power
• Premium - David Cormack: Polls never tell the real story
When the people of a country are on the verge of panicking or being stressed out, we look to our leaders for guidance. There have been regular updates from the Prime Minister as the Government capitalises on the fact that in a crisis, Jacinda Ardern is the perfect spokesperson. She exudes a calm authoritative empathy. If those three words can be used together.
National leader Simon Bridges had the opportunity to step up and also be a leaderly figure. Yet whenever he's presented with these opportunities, he always chooses to give the impression he'd be the sort of guy to boo during a minute's silence.
He's boldly politicised people's fears by issuing statements like "telling people to wash hands and tinkering with the jobseekers stand-down period isn't a plan." When actually telling people to wash their hands is a very good plan. Wash your hands people. And don't touch your face. That's what health experts have been saying. But Bridges doesn't think this is right, his petulance actually just makes it sound like he's getting all defensive because he doesn't wash his hands.
Bridges' big theory of saving New Zealand was tax cuts. Which yes, can have a stimulatory impact on the economy, but also we need our health sector properly funded when it's already straining. And also it would be great if Bridges had ideas to solve New Zealand's problems that went beyond tax cuts.
The lack of imagination shown by Bridges as he defaulted boringly to tax cuts was at least not shared by his finance spokesperson, Paul Goldsmith. After Bridges' initial blurt of cliches Goldsmith said the Government needs to be providing wage subsidies for heavily impacted sectors - something the Government said it was already considering. Goldsmith has clearly thought about the actual problem and then come up with genuine solutions which is exactly what we want to see from politicians.
I would think we'll see some announcements this week that are more Keynesian than Hayek, so wage subsidies are far more likely than tax cuts.
There's been a lot of talk that the Government's response to this could be the making or breaking of it, but really so long as people see that something is happening, it will just be enough that we're comforted.
While it certainly is a risk to the Government, National also has a serious issue facing it; between the global nature of the crisis and the focus on the government's response, National could lose any relevance it might have had. And if that happens, if people think the Government is responding acceptably and not hearing anything constructive from National's leader then we could see a more lopsided election result than seemed likely. And if that plays out, I suspect we'll see National finally wash its hands of the weird experiment that is the Simon Bridges leadership. Even if he doesn't think washing hands is a good idea.