Tana sought an injunction yesterday to stop the Sunday meeting, when party members were set to decide whether to use the law to oust the MP, who has resigned from the party.
After a hearing before Justice Simon Moore in the High Court at Auckland on Thursday, Tana’s lawyer, Sharyn Green, said a deal had been reached.
Tim Smith, of Thorndon Chambers, representing the respondents, Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick and others, has agreed to an interim injunction ahead of a full hearing for the injunction application, set for September 12 in the same court.
Tana sat in the public gallery during the brief hearing and later declined to comment to media.
When they returned, neither raised any issue with an interim injunction remaining in place ahead of the substantive hearing of the full injunction application in just over two weeks’ time.
“You’ve been able, between the two of you, to sensibly sort out the road forward,” Justice Moore said.
Tana had earlier indicated a preference for they/them pronouns.
Justice Moore sought clarity on this towards the end of the hearing.
“What is the applicant’s preferred pronoun for the purposes of consistency?”
“Mrs,” replied Green.
“That’s the honorific ... so her?” asked the judge.
“Yes.”
A minute issued by Justice Moore after the hearing shows Tana is seeking a judicial review of the decision by the Green Party to commission an independent investigation into the former Green MP’s awareness of, and the actions taken, regarding personal grievances taken by former employees of Tana’s husband’s company, E Cycles NZ Ltd.
”Additionally, Mrs Tana alleges unfairness and says she was induced to resign her membership of the party,” Justice Moore’s minute says.
Tana also sought an injunction to prevent the respondents – including Greens co-leader Swarbrick – from taking any further action as part of the investigation or convening a meeting on Sunday to decide Tana’s fate.
In a memo filed on Wednesday night, the respondents agreed not to convene the meeting before the hearing of the full application.
They also agreed not to send notice to the Speaker of the House under Sections 55A to 55D of the Electoral Act, covering how MPs can leave Parliament.
Tim Smith, lawyer for the respondents including Swarbrick, and Tana’s lawyer, Sharyn Green, agreed to those undertakings at Thursday morning’s hearing. As a result, they both consented to interim injunction orders.
Those orders prevent the party convening the meeting on Sunday or sending notice to the Speaker.
The full judicial review application will be heard in the High Court at Auckland on September 12, set down for a full-day hearing starting at 10am.
Swarbrick was not at Thursday morning’s hearing, but later said the party did not want to be caught up in protracted legal proceedings.
“This morning in court, under instructions from Marama Davidson and I as co-leaders, and our party governing council, Kaunihera, our lawyer agreed to defer our planned Special General Meeting until the proceedings brought by Darleen Tana are concluded, following a substantive hearing on 12 September,” Swarbrick said.
“We will, unfortunately, not be able to confirm a new date until we are confident in the appropriate conclusion of legal proceedings.
“We have been clear consistently that our approach has been to uphold our Green values. We are in Parliament to fight for people and planet and that’s where we want our focus to be.
“However, we are dealing with the situation in front of us and will do everything we can to ensure we continue to provide full transparency as the public of this country deserve.”
Green MP Ricardo Menendez March held a lunchtime media conference at Parliament saying he was confident in the processes his party had taken so far around the situation.
A new date for the meeting had not been set, he said. The date would continue to be discussed.
“We still believe the right thing for Darleen to do would be to resign. It is still our view that the way Darleen has acted makes them unfit for Parliament.
“This is not of our doing, Darleen chose to take this to the court,” he said.
“As Chlöe indicated yesterday, this is a thing that is happening at a really fast pace. I want to make it clear that part of that is avoiding this going longer than it needs to be.”
Menendez March said the party was fronting up “as often and soon as we can ... pretty much as we go.”
Asked if he felt “outmanoeuvred” by Tana, he said, “No.”
The party was responding to the situation in a very “Green party way”, Menendez March said, which involved bringing the membership along with the leadership as the party responded to the situation.
He said the party is focused on avoiding protracted proceedings and members want to move on from the issue.