Commenting on rugby is not really in my purview (can't use that word without thinking of In the Loop: "Allow me to pop a jaunty little bonnet on your purview and ram it up your ..." oops, too explicit). Anyway, as I was saying, me writing about sport is a bit like getting Bob Jones to review the Venice Biennale. But anyway, my friends, here goes.
This week both TV channels led with stories about a rugby player called Julian Savea who was charged with common assault after an incident with his partner. Savea was one of the frontmen for the "It's not okay" campaign against family violence.
At a press conference, the head of the New Zealand Rugby Union, Steve Tew, said the union was having an independent inquiry into the way "it supports young players".
Last week, Herald sportswriter Dana Johannsen, a woman, criticised Savea's rugby colleagues for going easy on Savea. It was well put and I understand what Dana was saying. But I don't think a blame game where either the rugby bosses or the players are being condemned or excused really scratches the surface of what is going on here.
The emotional problems of rugby players are a touchstone for the whole construct of manhood and what it means to be masculine in our culture. Maybe rather than the Rugby Union looking at how it treats its elite players, we all need to look at how we still make it "not okay" for men to show weakness and vulnerability.