A leading doctors' group has criticised a coroner for his alleged misunderstanding of the health sector when he made recommendations to rectify system failings in the care of Zachary Gravatt.
Following a judge's lifting of name suppression on four blameless health workers who cared for the 22-year-old medical student before he died of meningococcal C disease in 2009, the Herald asked three organisations what they had done to implement coroner Brandt Shortland's recommendations.
The Royal NZ College of General Practitioners said, "... the [college] has had discussions with the coroner's office regarding the difficulties around responding to coroner's [sic] recommendations when they are not based on a clear understanding of the roles played by various organisations in the health sector".
Chief coroner Judge Neil MacLean said he couldn't recall discussing the matter with the college and Mr Shortland hadn't had discussions with the college at all. Judge MacLean said he was confident in Mr Shortland's understanding of the health sector.
"The point needs to be made that the recommendations he made didn't come out of left field. They were the result of involvement and input from both the Gravatt family, who are very well informed medically, and the Auckland District Health Board representing key medical interests."