A man convicted of sexually abusing a young girl over a decade has had two years cut from his 10-year jail sentence.
The Court of Appeal, in a judgement released today, also quashed the five-year minimum period of imprisonment imposed by the sentencing judge after a Wellington District Court trial.
Facing four representative counts of indecency with a girl under 12 years of age and three representative counts of sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection, the 54-year-old got 10 years behind bars on the lead charge which involved forced oral sex.
Lesser sentences for the other charges, all historic and all to be served concurrently, remain in place.
The man's name is suppressed, along with any details that might identify the child.
Spanning 1982 to 1992, the offending occurred when the victim was aged about 3 to 13 years.
It had had a profound effect on every part of the girl's life, the ruling said.
The abuse stopped only when, aged about 14, she told her mother.
A complaint was laid with the police in 2008 when the man was arrested for indecently assaulting another girl.
The accused suffered a severe hearing disability and health problems resulting from heavy drug and alcohol consumption.
The Court of Appeal noted that if sentencing had immediately followed the offending (before September 1, 1993), under the Criminal Justice Act 1985 the appellant would not have been eligible for parole. But he could have qualified for remission of sentence after he had served two-thirds of his jail term.
Because minimum periods of imprisonment did not exist then, the court would have had no power to impose one.
