Mr Davison said little seating room was available in that court and he had seen other similar cases.
"I've had the same with other clients. It's a matter entirely for the presiding judge. It's not unusual for an accused person not to be required to go into the dock during sentencing."
But Mr Lloyd-Barker said he was unhappy with what he had seen in court when Killeen was discharged without conviction after she pleaded guilty to forgery charges which carry three- and 10-year jail sentences.
Adam Feeley, ex-chief executive of the Serious Fraud Office, also expressed surprise about her treatment, saying New Zealand had a legal system but not a justice system.
Mr Feeley said he had also spoken to police after the sentencing about how matters unfolded.
"These are not pleasantries normally afforded to people who commit crime. She didn't have to plead," he said, complaining that Mr Davison had instead pleaded on her behalf.
Under a section of the Sentencing Act, Killeen was acquitted, even though she pleaded guilty to both forgery charges. A sentencing indication hearing was held in October but all aspects were suppressed.
Mr Lloyd-Barker questioned the procedures followed this week.
"Ms Killeen was invited to sit next to her counsel at the table. I have never seen this happen before," he told Mr Byers.
"Secondly, Judge Sharp said Ms Killeen could be seated until she was actually sentenced. ... I do not understand why Ms Killeen was allowed to avoid standing or even sitting in the dock like every other prisoner," he complained.
He also admitted he had a personal interest, saying he had been general manager of the Auckland SPCA but was made redundant at a time when Killeen was on the board.