Some went a bit pursed-lips about it, while also giving away that they had read every word.
Judith Collins observed the report had certainly been "very detailed", before declining to comment on whether it was appropriate behaviour. Local Government Minister Chris Tremain said it was up to Auckland ratepayers to decide whether it was appropriate - something they will have three years to contemplate if Brown sticks to his guns.
Shane Jones, who has had his own issues relating to the bedroom, wisely forbore from making comment on Brown - although he could not resist completely, observing he was surprised that they had "taken the route of the Ngati Whatua room. That's r-o-u-t-e."
Perhaps the best response was from Ngati Whatua's Ngarimu Blair, who put a positive spin on it, pointing out that at least people now knew that there was a "Ngati Whatua" room at the council, "although it's a pretty dramatic way for people to learn that we have a Ngati Whatua suite".
There is nothing new about politicians having affairs. And there was nothing extraordinary about Brown's affair, really. The details were shocking simply because the act was described there in black and white. What they described was ordinary basic sex, nothing at all to compare with what the less-puritanical Italians enjoyed with their bunga-bunga former Prime Minister.
What was more interesting was watching people come up with the reasons it was a terrible thing warranting inspection and pressuring Brown to resign over it.
For some, the reason it was worthy of public exposure was that it was carried on on council property. Quite why that was so significant is unclear. On Grey's Anatomy, the supplies cupboard is in frequent use. Brown might have had more to answer for in that regard had council resources been used to wine and dine Bevan Chuang, or to buy the inexpensive, ill-fitting lingerie she said he had given her.
For others, the sin was that the affair was distracting Brown from his job as mayor, that every two minutes he dedicated to the affair was time he could have spent pondering how to ensure people's berms were mown without rate increases.
Everybody has distractions. In fact, when it comes to time, family and raising children is a far more time-consuming distraction than an affair.
The more valid analysis was what a two-year long affair said about Brown's character and judgment. Two years was two-thirds of his tenure as mayor.
The argument went that if his family could not trust him, how could the ratepayers? That was particularly accentuated when it came to his heartland constituency of South Auckland, where there is a strong moral element that tends to believe marriage vows mean what they say. Character is a valid reason for reporting on such shenanigans.
It took no time at all for questions to be raised about whether he should resign. There is no black-and-white rule on whether an MP should resign for having an affair. Criminal acts and issues such as fraud or blackmail are easier. But sexual shenanigans have always been a grey area.
In general, prime ministers and those who would be prime ministers are, and should be, held to a higher standard on such matters. Hence the attention paid to Don Brash's affair when National's leader.
It is a rather bizarre truth that the more immoral a politician is regarded as being already, the more likely he or she is to survive having an affair.
Of course, Brown's affair will provide some guidance to any who bother to engage in strategic thinking. The clear message is to pick your partner well. Don't pick somebody who knows your political enemy.
The trouble is that strategic thinking is rarely top of the mind when it comes to affairs. MPs have political advisers for all manner of things but not this one. For politicians, the same advice applies as for contraception. Abstinence is the safest option.
Debate on this article is now closed.
