"This is an affront to very important issues like health and education. It is absurd that while people wait for surgery, the Civilian Party receives $33,000 of taxpayer money for what is essentially a hobby horse."
But Mr Uffindell told the Herald the money was coming from a $3.28 million pool which would be fully allocated - mostly to National and Labour - anyway.
"If we didn't accept the money it doesn't go back to the taxpayer, it goes to National, Labour, the Greens and Mana and they already have a lot of money - more than me - and they don't need another $10,000 each," he said. "The taxpayer is short $3.2 million no matter what happens."
If it went to the major parties the money would be spent on "propaganda that's meant to brainwash people into believing them over the other guy".
"Our insincere purpose actually brings a different perspective ... which I think is a lot more valuable because it adds something to our political discourse that we didn't have already." That different perspective was humour.
A spokeswoman for the Electoral Commission said it would not comment on its preliminary funding decision. The funding was contingent on parties allocated money being registered with it when the House rose for the election on August 14.
Mr Uffindell was confident his party would be registered by then.
National Party pollster, blogger and Taxpayers Union co-founder David Farrar said Mr Key should welcome the funding from a Machiavellian point of view. "One could say the sort of people the Civilian Party might appeal to ... are unlikely to be National Party voters. They're more likely to be ... the ones Mana the Internet and Green party are probably going after."