Casting his mind back twelve months, Dr Gerstenberger says the thousands of aftershocks fit what was expected at the time.
"I think it has fallen in line with what we would expect," he says. "It's not unexpected given the size of the main one."
However the two destructive magnitude 6.3 tremors, on February 22 and June 15, were less expected.
"More often than not, you would not get two in that size range," Dr Gerstenberger says.
"It is certainly not unexpected that they occurred but it was not the most expected outcome."
Unfortunately another large one cannot be ruled out.
"There's a small possibility now for another [magnitude] six, but if you look at the numbers we have it is quite small.
"We can't ever rule that out."
According to GNS latest forecasts, in the next year there is an 82 per cent probability of a quake measuring between 5 and 5.4, a 39 per cent chance of a quake 5.5 to 5.9, a 10 per cent chance of a quake between 6 and 6.4, a 5 per cent chance of a magnitude 6.5 to 6.9 and a 2 per cent chance of a jolt measuring 7 to 7.9.
Dr Gerstenberger says the aftershocks may continue for "decades", although felt events could be months or years apart. For example, there are still small aftershocks from a magnitude 7.8 quake which struck Buller in 1929.
"As you can see in the last weeks and months, the numbers of events per day are gradually slowing down, [but] it will take many years for it to get back to the level that it was at prior to the occurrence of the [September 4 magnitude 7.1].
"But the felt events will get spaced further apart in time, it will soon be weeks and then months between the felt events."
One year on, the sequence of earthquakes has given GNS Science a wealth of data, which is being used to help better understand the volatile ground beneath us. GNS Science is also involved in 22 Canterbury rebuild projects.
"We're focusing a lot on the rebuild - that's our main focus," GNS Science communications manager John Callan says.
"But in the background the scientists are doing research on all the data which has been captured in the last year. There's a huge amount of data which will take them quite a while to sift through and analyse. They've only done first cut analyse at this stage. But it is a real treasure trove of information in terms of earthquakes.
"It is internationally significant because for an urban earthquake it is probably one of the best ever recorded urban earthquakes in the world. There were about 60 seismic instruments within a 50km radius of Christchurch, so it was very well recorded."
Dr Gerstenberger agrees.
"It has been a really well recorded event for a number of reasons. We've certainly learnt a lot from it and it improves our understanding of ground shaking, liquefaction and other aspects."
