It's 12 years since Auckland politicians rejected a waterfront stadium for the Rugby World Cup. Can we do it this time?
As Mayor Phil Goff succinctly put it: "There are a lot of hurdles." He's not kidding, this is a hugely ambitious project, fraught with political, financial and wider city risks. The stadium consortium has wisely gone out to win the hearts and minds of Aucklanders to bring politicians to the table. The project will only come off with some heavy lifting from Auckland Council and the Government. Over the next 12 to 18 months, the consortium will test the technical, engineering and financial feasibility of the project. If it stacks up, and it's a big 'if", it will seek a lead developer to first build the stadium and then develop Bledisloe Wharf and Eden Park for housing and commercial purposes to pay the estimated $1.8 billion cost of the stadium.
Who are the key players?
Property valuer Dave Wigmore and lawyer Michael Sage, who are heading the Auckland Waterfront Consortium, are not big names you would associate with a project of this size. Behind them are a group of professional service companies who have been planning, designing and costing the stadium over 18 months. They have a solid and well-presented proposal warranting serious consideration. To move forward they need the backing of Mayor Phil Goff, a majority of councillors, and the Government. The Eden Park Trust Board is clearly uninterested in playing ball and will fight the same fight it did in 2006 to stay put. Ditto Ports of Auckland. The port company is starting work next year on a huge car-handling building on land the consortium wants for housing. Ngati Whatua, another key player, is keen on a new downtown stadium, but wants a discussion about where is the best place, including railway land it owns in the city.
What needs to happen to free up Eden Park and Bledisloe Wharf?