Bronwyn Pullar has been exonerated by police investigating claims that she attempted to use extortion against ACC. This raises many questions - especially about whether ACC actually used the allegations in a deliberate attempt to distract from their own incompetence - see: ACC used police as smokescreen, say Greens. If so, it only provided a temporary distraction, and looks to have blown up in their faces. The police appear to have unequivocally cleared both Pullar and Michelle Boag, and this represents quite a victory for them - one that Boag is indicating she may further pursue in the courts.
ACC chief executive Ralph Stewart is hanging tough saying that the corporation would take the same action again. The problem for ACC and their Minister, Judith Collins, is that the police decision raises a number of awkward questions. David Farrar has a list of ten Questions for ACC, focusing on why ACC waited three months to make the complaint. He suggests that Judith Collins should start looking for new board members.
Pullar herself is in no doubt that Collins has been misled by her department: 'How can the minister [Judith Collins] have confidence in her chairman [John Judge] who continues to stand behind a report that contains blatant lies?' - see Phil Kitchin's ACC report contains 'blatant lies'. Collins' refusal to be make any comment on the latest developments risks being seen as an implicit endorsement of ACC's actions.
Perversely the Prime Minister appears to be hinting that the police decision may help clear the way for the return of Nick Smith to cabinet, although he did say it depended on the outcome of other inquiries, including those by the Privacy Commission - see: Smith could return to Cabinet - Key.
The class size fiasco could be a crucial turning point for the Government according to Duncan Garner who reports that his daughter has brought home a very clear message of condemnation from school: 'We all hate John Key' - see his must-read blog post, Hekia Parata should've asked one simple question. Such complaints about the National Government are probably being heard in hundreds of thousands of homes around the country. Garner says 'It's a cock-up. Nothing else, nothing less. And all because the Education Minister, Hekia Parata, didn't ask the right questions of the right people. Her eye was off the ball. The Cabinet's collective eyes were off the ball. John Key's move to save a paltry $43m by increasing class sizes in our intermediate schools has completely backfired. It is a stuff-up of epic proportions - and all in the name of cost-cutting.'
Garner makes the point that in the past Key and English have been very careful to stick to their promises and maintain their credibility and that this is a major departure from that approach for which National might pay a heavy price.
Labour has certainly latched onto the absence of the class size policy in National's pre-election policy saying it would have almost certainly cost them votes - see Radio NZ's Class-size decision made since election - Parata. That view is backed up by TVNZ's poll which shows that 79% of respondents oppose the policy ('Anti-education' cuts slammed). That's an awful number for any government, but especially over a policy which has such a direct impact on so many households and which is being strongly opposed by a vocal, well-organised and united sector. For an example of that sector's persuasive strength, see PPTA President Robin Duff's Govt's class size debacle leaves a handful of options.