With the Government's asset sales programme dragging out until the next election, it gives plenty of time for analysis. David Beatson made good use of the wet holiday weather to go through the pre-Christmas news dump. In his post MOM...Show me the money! Beatson observes that the political compromises made during the election to limit foreign ownership will undermine the economic rationale originally supported by Treasury.
It is going to be a very difficult balancing act for the Government to make assets sales politically saleable. The Herald on Sunday editorial focuses on the lack of guarantee on power prices for consumers (see: A long wait for cheaper power), while Bernard Hickey says that the share float price must be 'not too hot, not too cold, but just right' - see Floats must hit Goldilocks standard. If the price is seen as too low taxpayers will feel cheated, too high and it will fail to attract the wide-spread New Zealand-based ownership that the Government claims to want.
The 'mixed ownership model' has also been mooted for the Ports of Auckland by C&R councillors, as the dispute drags on with further industrial action scheduled for today. Bernard Orsman reports in Mayor gives striking port union the message that Len Brown has 'issued an ultimatum' to the port workers about agreeing to the port company's demand for flexibility in the interests of greater capital returns for the council.
Brown may be feeling the heat applied by Cameron Slater over a $2000 donation from the Maritime Union for his 2010 mayoral election campaign - see his blog post: The best investment the maritime union ever made. Although, it has to be said, if that is the price for having the mayor of the supercity in your pocket, Brown needs to review his rate card.
Matt McCarten claims that the rate of return being demanded by the port company directors is 'insane' given the financial position of most ports around the world. McCarten argues that the new directors of the company - of whom only one out of six has shipping experience - are there to sell the port not run it - see: Greedy wharfies' tale hides ambitions for port