At the instigation of the local police, Whangaparaoa Primary School installed three of the alarms at a cost of more than $5000 after several security cameras disappeared. Principal Steve Collins told the local paper parts of his school are now no longer considered "suitable gathering areas" and he is "absolutely delighted" with the effectiveness of the devices.
So are the police, who claim the amount of "anti-social behaviour" and/or "low level" crime has dropped. As a result, Auckland Council, through its Hibiscus and Bays Local Board, is funding the installation of these anti-child devices along the "crime corridor" that takes in the primary and secondary school grounds, along with Edith Hopper Park, Stanmore Bay Skate Park, and parts of the local football club and Stanmore Bay Beach.
The police will use them to help combat tagging, liquor ban breaches, wilful damage, minor assaults and low-level drug dealing during the problem hours of 10pm to 3am, Thursday to Sunday. It's part of a crime crackdown that includes removing trees that might provide cover for vandals and burglars, and the installation of sensor lighting.
The police argue the Mosquito devices are only switched on in "unsociable hours" and therefore don't affect other people's enjoyment of public spaces. But these days, 10pm is far from an unsociable hour, so why should the innocent under-25s with nothing but a desire for a romantic stroll in the park, be indiscriminately driven out for nothing more than the crime of having acute hearing?
In their presentation to the local board, the police and SLS Security, the sales agents for Mosquito, submitted a legal opinion claiming the device was not in breach of the Human Rights Act 1998. It might not be, but as an English act, that's rather irrelevant to New Zealand. The opinion was from Hewitsons Solicitors, a firm of English lawyers based in Cambridge, Milton Keynes and Northampton.
There's no mention in the legal opinion that in 2008, then Children's Commissioner for England, Sir Al Aynsley-Green, called for them to be banned, warning "these devices are indiscriminate and target all children and young people, including babies, regardless of whether they are behaving or misbehaving". He said: "The use of measures such as these is simply demonising children and young people, creating a dangerous and widening divide between the young and the old."
Also, locally, they're only being used to target our young, but the latest models have two settings, the 17.5kHz wave band aimed at the young and an 8kHz setting that can be heard by everyone. In the United States, this setting is used to disperse the homeless and beggars.
The Liverpool police have earned an award for innovation by attaching them to a vehicle in order to herd young troublemakers. The machines have four loudness settings, the top is an ear splitting 104 decibels, the normal allegedly a loud 75 decibels. Auckland Council bylaws state that "excessive noise is any noise that is under human control and of such a nature as to unreasonably interfere with the peace, comfort and convenience of any person".
Perhaps it's time to say enough.